Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What are wereallydecoding? Unveiling biases in EEG-based decoding of the spatial focus of auditory attention.
Rotaru, Iustina; Geirnaert, Simon; Heintz, Nicolas; Van de Ryck, Iris; Bertrand, Alexander; Francart, Tom.
Afiliação
  • Rotaru I; Department of Neurosciences, ExpORL, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 bus 721, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
  • Geirnaert S; Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), Stadius Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.
  • Heintz N; Department of Neurosciences, ExpORL, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 bus 721, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
  • Van de Ryck I; Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), Stadius Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.
  • Bertrand A; Leuven.AI-KU Leuven Institute for AI, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Francart T; Department of Neurosciences, ExpORL, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 bus 721, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
J Neural Eng ; 21(1)2024 02 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38266281
ABSTRACT
Objective.Spatial auditory attention decoding (Sp-AAD) refers to the task of identifying the direction of the speaker to which a person is attending in a multi-talker setting, based on the listener's neural recordings, e.g. electroencephalography (EEG). The goal of this study is to thoroughly investigate potential biases when training such Sp-AAD decoders on EEG data, particularly eye-gaze biases and latent trial-dependent confounds, which may result in Sp-AAD models that decode eye-gaze or trial-specific fingerprints rather than spatial auditory attention.Approach.We designed a two-speaker audiovisual Sp-AAD protocol in which the spatial auditory and visual attention were enforced to be either congruent or incongruent, and we recorded EEG data from sixteen participants undergoing several trials recorded at distinct timepoints. We trained a simple linear model for Sp-AAD based on common spatial patterns filters in combination with either linear discriminant analysis (LDA) or k-means clustering, and evaluated them both across- and within-trial.Main results.We found that even a simple linear Sp-AAD model is susceptible to overfitting to confounding signal patterns such as eye-gaze and trial fingerprints (e.g. due to feature shifts across trials), resulting in artificially high decoding accuracies. Furthermore, we found that changes in the EEG signal statistics across trials deteriorate the trial generalization of the classifier, even when the latter is retrained on the test trial with an unsupervised algorithm.Significance.Collectively, our findings confirm that there exist subtle biases and confounds that can strongly interfere with the decoding of spatial auditory attention from EEG. It is expected that more complicated non-linear models based on deep neural networks, which are often used for Sp-AAD, are even more vulnerable to such biases. Future work should perform experiments and model evaluations that avoid and/or control for such biases in Sp-AAD tasks.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Percepção Auditiva / Percepção da Fala Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Neural Eng Assunto da revista: NEUROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Percepção Auditiva / Percepção da Fala Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Neural Eng Assunto da revista: NEUROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica