Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Novel contouring method for optimizing MRI flow quantification in patients with aortic valve disease.
Yaman, Malek M; Chetrit, Michael; Bullen, Jennifer; Bolen, Michael A; Flamm, Scott D; Kwon, Deborah.
Afiliação
  • Yaman MM; Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. elyamam@ccf.org.
  • Chetrit M; Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
  • Bullen J; Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
  • Bolen MA; Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
  • Flamm SD; Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
  • Kwon D; Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ; 40(3): 665-673, 2024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38286950
ABSTRACT
Optimizing MRI aortic flow quantification is crucial for accurate assessment of valvular disease severity. In this study, we sought to evaluate the accuracy of a novel method of contouring systolic aortic forward flow in comparison to standard contouring methods at various aortic levels. The study included a cohort of patients with native aortic valve (AoV) disease and a small control group referred to cardiac MRI over a 1-year period. Inclusion criteria included aortic flow quantification at aortic valve and one additional level, and no or trace mitral regurgitation (MR) documented both by the MRI AND an echocardiogram done within a year. In addition to flow quantification with standard contouring (SC), a novel Selective Systolic Contouring (SSC) method was performed at aortic valve level, contouring the area demarcated by the AoV leaflets in systole. The bias in each technique's estimate of aortic forward flow was calculated as the mean difference between aortic forward flow and left ventricular stroke volume (LV SV). 98 patients (mean age 56, 71% male) were included 33 with tricuspid and 65 with congenitally abnormal (bicuspid or unicuspid) AoV. All methods tended to underestimate aortic forward flow, but the bias was smallest with the SSC method (p < 0.001). Therefore, SSC yielded the lowest estimates of mitral regurgitant volume (4.8 ml) and regurgitant fraction (3.9%) (p < 0.05). SSC at AoV level better approximates LV SV in our cohort, and may provide more accurate quantitative assessment of both aortic and mitral valve function.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Valvopatia Aórtica / Insuficiência da Valva Mitral Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Valvopatia Aórtica / Insuficiência da Valva Mitral Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos