Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Can we predict whether a man with acute or chronic urinary retention will void after bladder outflow resistance reduction surgery? ICI-RS 2023.
Tarcan, Tufan; Acar, Ömer; Malde, Sachin; Sinha, Sanjay; Sahai, Arun; Perrouin-Verbe, Marie-Aimee; Hashim, Hashim; Agro, Enrico Finazzi; Wein, Alan; Abrams, Paul.
Afiliação
  • Tarcan T; Department of Urology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Acar Ö; Department of Urology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Malde S; Department of Urology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Sinha S; College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Sahai A; Department of Urology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College, London, UK.
  • Perrouin-Verbe MA; Department of Urology, Apollo Hospital, Hyderabad, India.
  • Hashim H; Department of Urology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College, London, UK.
  • Agro EF; Urology Department, CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, Nantes, France.
  • Wein A; Bristol Urological Institute, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
  • Abrams P; Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome Tor Vergata and Urology Unit, Policlinico Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Neurourol Urodyn ; 43(6): 1439-1446, 2024 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38291822
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

To address the predictive factors of a successful voiding after bladder outflow resistance reduction surgery (BORRS) in men presenting with acute or chronic urinary retention (UR).

METHODS:

A think tank (TT) of ICI-RS was gathered in 2023, Bristol, UK, to discuss several aspects of the problem, such as the pathophysiology of UR, the clinical and urodynamic evaluation of men with UR and whether it is possible to predict which men will be able to successfully void after treatment with contemporary surgical options.

RESULTS:

The TT agreed that successful voiding after BORRS depends on several factors but that a strong recommendation cannot be made regarding preoperative evaluation and whether there are predictive factors of success because of the heterogeneity of patients and methodology in published trials. The diagnosis of obstruction in men with UR may be challenging when there is apparent reduced detrusor contraction during urodynamic studies. Even in the absence of bladder contractility there is documentation of such cases that have voided adequately after BORRS. Still, detrusor underactivity and inadequate relief of prostatic obstruction are the main causes of an unsuccessful voiding after BORRS. Conventional resection and enucleation methods remain the most successful surgeries in relieving UR in men, whereas the efficacy of minimally invasive surgical treatments needs to be assessed further.

CONCLUSION:

Research is needed to understand the pathophysiology of UR and the predictors of successful voiding after different types of BORRS in men with UR.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Urodinâmica / Bexiga Urinária / Retenção Urinária Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Neurourol Urodyn Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Urodinâmica / Bexiga Urinária / Retenção Urinária Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Neurourol Urodyn Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia