Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Continuous Wound Irrigation and Intraoperative Methadone Decreases Opioid Use and Shortens Length of Stay After CRS/HIPEC.
Boesl, Markus A; Brown, Noah; Bleicher, Josh; Call, Tyler; Lambert, Donald H; Lambert, Laura A.
Afiliação
  • Boesl MA; Department of General Surgery, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Brown N; Department of General Surgery, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Bleicher J; Department of General Surgery, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Call T; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Lambert DH; Department of Anesthesiology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Lambert LA; Department of General Surgery, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Laura.Lambert@hci.utah.edu.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 31(6): 3742-3749, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38300404
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Epidural analgesia is resource and labor intense and may limit postoperative management options and delay discharge. This study compared postoperative outcomes after cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) with epidural analgesia versus continuous wound infusion system (CWIS) with/without intraoperative methadone.

METHODS:

A single-institution, retrospective chart review was performed including all patients undergoing open CRS/HIPEC from 2018 to 2021. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, length of stay, and in-hospital analgesic use were reviewed. In-hospital opioid exposure in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) was calculated. Multivariate analysis (MVA) for mean total and daily opioid exposure was conducted.

RESULTS:

A total of 157 patients were included. Fifty-three (34%) had epidural analgesia, 96 (61%) had CWIS, and 79 (50%) received methadone. Length of stay was significantly shorter with CWIS + methadone versus epidural (7 vs. 8 days, p < 0.01). MVA showed significantly lower mean total and daily opioid exposure with CWIS+methadone versus epidural (total 252.8 ± 17.7 MME vs. 486.8 ± 86.6 MME; odds ratio [OR] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.98, p = 0.04; Daily 32.8 ± 2.0 MME vs. 51.9 ± 5.7 MME, OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.52-0.99, p ≤ 0.05). The CWIS-only group (n = 17) had a significantly lower median oral opioid exposure versus epidural (135 MME vs. 7.5 MME, p < 0.001) and longer length of stay versus CWIS + methadone (9 vs. 7 days, p = 0.04), There were no CWIS or methadone-associated complications and one epidural abscess.

CONCLUSIONS:

CWIS + methadone safely offers better pain control with less in-hospital opioid use, shorter length of stay, and decreased resource utilization compared with epidural analgesia in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor Pós-Operatória / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução / Analgésicos Opioides / Tempo de Internação / Metadona Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor Pós-Operatória / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução / Analgésicos Opioides / Tempo de Internação / Metadona Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos