Editor's Choice - Short Term Cost Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation and High Ligation and Stripping for Great Saphenous Vein Incompetence.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg
; 67(5): 811-817, 2024 May.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38311050
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
Superficial venous incompetence (SVI) is a common disease that causes significant quality of life (QoL) impairment. There is a need for more health economic evaluations of SVI treatment. The aim of this study was to perform a cost effectiveness analysis in patients with great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence comparing radiofrequency ablation (RFA), high ligation and stripping (HL/S), and no treatment or conservative treatment with one year follow up.METHODS:
Randomised controlled trial economic analysis from an ongoing trial; 143 patients (156 limbs) with GSV incompetence (CEAP clinical class 2 - 6) were included. Treatment was performed with RFA or HL/S. Follow up was performed up to one year using duplex ultrasound, revised venous clinical severity score (r-VCSS), Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ), and EuroQol-5D-3L (EQ-5D-3L).RESULTS:
Seventy-eight limbs were treated with RFA and HL/S respectively. No treatment or conservative treatment was assumed to have zero in treatment cost and no treatment benefit. In the RFA group, one limb had reflux in the GSV after one month and three limbs after one year. In HL/S, two limbs had remaining reflux in the treated area at one month and one year. Both disease severity (r-VCSS, p = .004) and QoL (AVVQ, p = .021 and EQ-5D-3L, p = .028) were significantly improved over time. The QALY gain was 0.21 for RFA and 0.17 for HL/S. The cost per patient was calculated as 1 292 for RFA and 2 303 for HL/S. The cost per QALY (compared with no treatment or conservative treatment) was 6 155 for RFA and 13 549 for HL/S. With added cost for days absent from work the cost per QALY was 7 358 for RFA and 24 197 for HL/S. The cost per QALY for both methods was well below the threshold suggested by Swedish National Board of Health.CONCLUSION:
RFA is more cost effective than HL/S and no treatment or conservative treatment at one year follow up.Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Qualidade de Vida
/
Veia Safena
/
Insuficiência Venosa
/
Análise Custo-Benefício
/
Ablação por Radiofrequência
Tipo de estudo:
Clinical_trials
/
Health_economic_evaluation
Limite:
Adult
/
Aged
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg
Assunto da revista:
ANGIOLOGIA
Ano de publicação:
2024
Tipo de documento:
Article