Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Using a standalone ear-EEG device for focal-onset seizure detection.
Joyner, McGregor; Hsu, Sheng-Hsiou; Martin, Stephanie; Dwyer, Jennifer; Chen, Denise Fay; Sameni, Reza; Waters, Samuel H; Borodin, Konstantin; Clifford, Gari D; Levey, Allan I; Hixson, John; Winkel, Daniel; Berent, Jonathan.
Afiliação
  • Joyner M; NextSense Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA.
  • Hsu SH; NextSense Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA.
  • Martin S; NextSense Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA.
  • Dwyer J; NextSense Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA.
  • Chen DF; Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Sameni R; Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Waters SH; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Borodin K; NextSense Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA.
  • Clifford GD; Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Levey AI; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Hixson J; Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Winkel D; Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Berent J; Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Bioelectron Med ; 10(1): 4, 2024 Feb 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38321561
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Seizure detection is challenging outside the clinical environment due to the lack of comfortable, reliable, and practical long-term neurophysiological monitoring devices. We developed a novel, discreet, unobstructive in-ear sensing system that enables long-term electroencephalography (EEG) recording. This is the first study we are aware of that systematically compares the seizure detection utility of in-ear EEG with that of simultaneously recorded intracranial EEG. In addition, we present a similar comparison between simultaneously recorded in-ear EEG and scalp EEG.

METHODS:

In this foundational research, we conducted a clinical feasibility study and validated the ability of the ear-EEG system to capture focal-onset seizures against 1255 hrs of simultaneous ear-EEG data along with scalp or intracranial EEG in 20 patients with refractory focal epilepsy (11 with scalp EEG, 8 with intracranial EEG, and 1 with both).

RESULTS:

In a blinded, independent review of the ear-EEG signals, two epileptologists were able to detect 86.4% of the seizures that were subsequently identified using the clinical gold standard EEG modalities, with a false detection rate of 0.1 per day, well below what has been reported for ambulatory monitoring. The few seizures not detected on the ear-EEG signals emanated from deep within the mesial temporal lobe or extra-temporally and remained very focal, without significant propagation. Following multiple sessions of recording for a median continuous wear time of 13 hrs, patients reported a high degree of tolerance for the device, with only minor adverse events reported by the scalp EEG cohort.

CONCLUSIONS:

These preliminary results demonstrate the potential of using ear-EEG to enable routine collection of complementary, prolonged, and remote neurophysiological evidence, which may permit real-time detection of paroxysmal events such as seizures and epileptiform discharges. This study suggests that the ear-EEG device may assist clinicians in making an epilepsy diagnosis, assessing treatment efficacy, and optimizing medication titration.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Bioelectron Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Bioelectron Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos