Oncology and intensive care doctors' perception of intensive care admission of cancer patients: A cross-sectional national survey.
Aust Crit Care
; 37(4): 520-529, 2024 Jul.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38350752
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION:
Prognosis in oncology has improved with early diagnosis and novel therapies. However, critical illness continues to trigger clinical and ethical dilemmas for the treating oncology and intensive care unit (ICU) doctors.OBJECTIVES:
The objective of this study was to investigate the perceptions of oncology and ICU doctors in managing critically ill cancer patients.METHODS:
A cross-sectional web-based survey exploring the management of a fictitious acutely deteriorating case vignette with solid-organ malignancy. The survey weblink was distributed between May and July 2022 to all Australian oncology and ICU doctors via newsletters to the members of the Medical Oncology Group of Australia, the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society, and the College of Intensive Care Medicine inviting them to participate. The weblink was active till August 2022. The six domains included patient prognostication, advanced care plan, collaborative management, legal/ethical/moral challenges, ICU referral, and protocol-based ICU admission. The outcomes were reported as the level of agreement between oncology and ICU doctors for each domain/question.RESULTS:
184 responses (64 oncology and 120 ICU doctors) were analysed. Most respondents were specialists (78.1% [n = 50] oncology, 78.3% [n = 94] ICU doctors). Oncology doctors more commonly reported managing cancer patients with poor prognosis than ICU doctors (p < 0.001). Oncology doctors less commonly referred such patients for ICU admission (29.7% [n = 19] vs. 80.8% [n = 97], p < 0.001; odds ratio [OR] = 0.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.03-0.16) and infrequently encountered patients with prior goals of care (GOC) in medical emergency team escalations (40.6% [n = 26] vs. 86.7% [n = 104]; p < 0.001; OR = 0.06; 95% CI 0.02-0.15; p < 0.001). Oncology doctors were less likely to discuss GOC during medical emergency team calls or within 24 h of ICU admission. More oncology doctors than ICU doctors thought that training rotation in the corresponding speciality group was beneficial (56.3% [n = 36] vs. 31.7% [n = 38]; p = 0.012; OR = 2.07; 95% CI 1.02-4.23; p = 0.045).CONCLUSION:
Oncology doctors were less likely to encounter acute patient deterioration or establish timely GOC for such patients. Oncology doctors believed that an ICU rotation during their training may have helped manage challenging situations.Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Neoplasias
Tipo de estudo:
Guideline
/
Prevalence_studies
/
Screening_studies
Limite:
Adult
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
País/Região como assunto:
Oceania
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Aust Crit Care
Assunto da revista:
ENFERMAGEM
/
TERAPIA INTENSIVA
Ano de publicação:
2024
Tipo de documento:
Article