Distances and angles in standing long-leg radiographs: comparing conventional radiography, digital radiography, and EOS.
Skeletal Radiol
; 53(8): 1517-1528, 2024 Aug.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38378861
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
Distances and angles measured from long-leg radiographs (LLR) are important for surgical decision-making. However, projectional radiography suffers from distortion, potentially generating differences between measurement and true anatomical dimension. These phenomena are not uniform between conventional radiography (CR) digital radiography (DR) and fan-beam technology (EOS). We aimed to identify differences between these modalities in an experimental setup. MATERIALS ANDMETHODS:
A hemiskeleton was stabilized using an external fixator in neutral, valgus and varus knee alignment. Ten images were acquired for each alignment and each modality one CR setup, two different DR systems, and an EOS. A total of 1680 measurements were acquired and analyzed.RESULTS:
We observed great differences for dimensions and angles between the 4 modalities. Femoral head diameter measurements varied in the range of > 5 mm depending on the modality, with EOS being the closest to the true anatomical dimension. With functional leg length, a difference of 8.7% was observed between CR and EOS and with the EOS system being precise in the vertical dimension on physical-technical grounds, this demonstrates significant projectional magnification with CR-LLR. The horizontal distance between the medial malleoli varied by 20 mm between CR and DR, equating to 21% of the mean.CONCLUSIONS:
Projectional distortion resulting in variations approaching 21% of the mean indicate, that our confidence on measurements from standing LLR may not be justified. It appears likely that among the tested equipment, EOS-generated images are closest to the true anatomical situation most of the time.Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Intensificação de Imagem Radiográfica
Limite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Skeletal Radiol
Ano de publicação:
2024
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
Alemanha