Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Global Guidelines in Dermatology Mapping Project (GUIDEMAP)-A systematic review of the methodological quality of contact dermatitis clinical practice guidelines.
van Zuuren, Esther J; Arents, Bernd W M; Vermeulen, Sofieke; Schoones, Jan W; Fedorowicz, Zbys.
Afiliação
  • van Zuuren EJ; Dermatology Department, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Arents BWM; Dutch Association for People with Atopic Dermatitis, Nijkerk, The Netherlands.
  • Vermeulen S; Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Schoones JW; Directorate of Research Policy (formerly: Walaeus Library), Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Fedorowicz Z; Veritas Health Sciences Consultancy, Huntingdon, UK.
Contact Dermatitis ; 90(6): 543-555, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38403277
ABSTRACT
The Global Guidelines in Dermatology Mapping Project (GUIDEMAP) assesses the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for high-burden skin diseases. This review focuses on contact dermatitis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Emcare, Epistemonikos, PsycINFO and Academic Search Premier for CPGs published between 1 November 2018 and 1 November 2023. Prespecified guideline resources were hand searched. Two authors independently undertook screening, data extraction and quality assessments. Instruments used were the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II Reporting Checklist, the U.S. Institute of Medicine's (IOM) criteria of trustworthiness, The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's National Guideline Clearinghouse Extent Adherence to Trustworthy Standards (NEATS) Instrument and Lenzer's Red Flags. Twenty five CPGs were included, exhibiting heterogeneity in both the topics they addressed and their methodological quality. Whereas the CPGs on management of hand eczema from Denmark, Europe and the Netherlands scored best, most CPGs fell short of being clear, unbiased, trustworthy and evidence-based. Disclosure of conflicts of interest scored well, and areas needing improvement include 'strength and wording of recommendations', 'applicability', 'updating' and 'external review'. Adhering to AGREE II and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) enhances methodological quality.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Contact Dermatitis Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Contact Dermatitis Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda