Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evidence review and considerations for use of first line genome sequencing to diagnose rare genetic disorders.
Wigby, Kristen M; Brockman, Deanna; Costain, Gregory; Hale, Caitlin; Taylor, Stacie L; Belmont, John; Bick, David; Dimmock, David; Fernbach, Susan; Greally, John; Jobanputra, Vaidehi; Kulkarni, Shashikant; Spiteri, Elizabeth; Taft, Ryan J.
Afiliação
  • Wigby KM; University of California, Davis, CA, USA. kmwigby@ucdavis.edu.
  • Brockman D; Rady Children's Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA. kmwigby@ucdavis.edu.
  • Costain G; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Hale C; The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, CA, USA.
  • Taylor SL; Stanford Healthcare, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
  • Belmont J; Illumina Inc, San Diego, CA, USA.
  • Bick D; Genetics & Genomics Services Inc, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Dimmock D; Genomics England Ltd, London, UK.
  • Fernbach S; Rady Children's Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA.
  • Greally J; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Jobanputra V; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
  • Kulkarni S; New York Genome Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Spiteri E; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Taft RJ; Stanford Healthcare, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
NPJ Genom Med ; 9(1): 15, 2024 Feb 26.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38409289
ABSTRACT
Early use of genome sequencing (GS) in the diagnostic odyssey can reduce suffering and improve care, but questions remain about which patient populations are most amenable to GS as a first-line diagnostic test. To address this, the Medical Genome Initiative conducted a literature review to identify appropriate clinical indications for GS. Studies published from January 2011 to August 2022 that reported on the diagnostic yield (DY) or clinical utility of GS were included. An exploratory meta-analysis using a random effects model evaluated DY based on cohort size and diagnosed cases per cohort. Seventy-one studies met inclusion criteria, comprising over 13,000 patients who received GS in one of the following settings hospitalized pediatric patients, pediatric outpatients, adult outpatients, or mixed. GS was the first-line test in 38% (27/71). The unweighted mean DY of first-line GS was 45% (12-73%), 33% (6-86%) in cohorts with prior genetic testing, and 33% (9-60%) in exome-negative cohorts. Clinical utility was reported in 81% of first-line GS studies in hospitalized pediatric patients. Changes in management varied by cohort and underlying molecular diagnosis (24-100%). To develop evidence-informed points to consider, the quality of all 71 studies was assessed using modified American College of Radiology (ACR) criteria, with five core points to consider developed, including recommendations for use of GS in the N/PICU, in lieu of sequential testing and when disorders with substantial allelic heterogeneity are suspected. Future large and controlled studies in the pediatric and adult populations may support further refinement of these recommendations.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: NPJ Genom Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: NPJ Genom Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos