Keloid and Hypertrophic Scars Treatment.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hypertrophic scars are contained within the site of injury and may regress over time, while keloids spread beyond the borders of the initial injury and do not regress. On histologic examination, hypertrophic scars tend to have collagen in a wavy, regular pattern, whereas keloids have no distinct pattern of collagen. OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyze improvement in keloid and hypertrophic scars characteristics following treatment with Ablative 10600 nm and a non-Ablative 1570 nm Hybrid Laser Device. METHODS: Treatment parameters with the ProScan Hybrid Mode were 40 W/1.3-1.5 ms for the CO2 and 12 W/4 ms for the 1570 nm in a 11 ratio. Outcomes were assessed based on physician scar grading as measured by the Vancouver Scar Scale and patient-reported satisfaction. Excel was used for data analysis, and a p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Adverse events and patient pain were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 31 hypertrophic scars and 30 keloid scars were treated. There was a significant reduction in Vancouver Scar Scale scores for both hypertrophic and keloid scars (62% ± 8% and 58% ± 7%; p = 2.6E-17 and p = 8.29E-26, respectively). In a scar-based comparison, a statistically significant difference was observed for all measures reflecting favorable outcomes for hypertrophic scars (VSS, p = 1.1E-05; satisfaction, p = 0.0112; pain, p = 0.00081). Only one adverse event was reported, a superficial burn treated with topical antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: The device was found to be safe and effective, with promising results for the treatment of hypertrophic and keloid scars. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.