Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Persistent COVID-19 parosmia and olfactory loss post olfactory training: randomized clinical trial comparing central and peripheral-acting therapeutics.
Cantone, Elena; D'Ascanio, Luca; De Luca, Pietro; Roccamatisi, Dalila; La La Mantia, Ignazio; Brenner, Michael J; Di Stadio, Arianna.
Afiliação
  • Cantone E; Department of Otolaryngology, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
  • D'Ascanio L; Department of Otolaryngology, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Fano, Italy.
  • De Luca P; Department of Otolaryngology, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina-Gemelli Isola, Rome, Italy.
  • Roccamatisi D; Psychology Department, UTIU, Rome, Italy.
  • La La Mantia I; GF Ingrassia Department, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
  • Brenner MJ; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Di Stadio A; GF Ingrassia Department, University of Catania, Catania, Italy. ariannadistadio@hotmail.com.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 281(7): 3671-3678, 2024 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38492007
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Although COVID-19 anosmia is often transient, patients with persistent olfactory dysfunction (pOD) can experience refractory parosmia and diminished smell. This study evaluated four putative therapies for parosmia in patients with chronic COVID-19 olfactory impairment.

METHODS:

After screening nasal endoscopy, 85 patients (49 female, 58%) with pOD and treatment-refractory parosmia were randomized to (1) ultramicronized palmitoylethanolamide and luteolin + olfactory training (OT) (umPEALUT group, n = 17), (2) alpha-lipoic acid + OT (ALA group, n = 21), (3) umPEALUT + ALA + OT (combination group, n = 28), or 4) olfactory training (OT) alone (control group, n = 23). Olfactory function was assessed at baseline (T0) and 6 months (T1) using a parosmia questionnaire and Sniffin' Sticks test of odor threshold, detection, and identification (TDI). Analyses included one-way ANOVA for numeric data and Chi-Square analyses for nominal data on parosmia.

RESULTS:

The umPEALUT group had the largest improvement in TDI scores (21.8 ± 9.4 to 29.7 ± 7.5) followed by the combination group (19.6 ± 6.29 to 27.5 ± 2.7), both p < 0.01. The control and ALA groups had no significant change. Patients in the combination and umPEALUT groups had significantly improved TDI scores compared to ALA and control groups (p < 0.001). Rates of parosmia resolution after 6 months were reported at 96% for combination, 65% for control, 53% for umPEALUT and 29% for ALA (p < 0.001). All treatment regimens were well-tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS:

umPEALUT and OT, with or without ALA, was associated with improvement in TDI scores and parosmia, whereas OT alone or OT with ALA were associated with little benefit.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ácido Tióctico / COVID-19 / Transtornos do Olfato Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Assunto da revista: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ácido Tióctico / COVID-19 / Transtornos do Olfato Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Assunto da revista: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália