Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Neuromyths: Misconceptions about neurodevelopment by Italian teachers.
Bei, Eva; Argiropoulos, Dimitris; Van Herwegen, Jo; Incognito, Oriana; Menichetti, Laura; Tarchi, Christian; Pecini, Chiara.
Afiliação
  • Bei E; Department of Education, Languages, Intercultures, Literatures and Psychology (FORLIPSI), University of Florence, Via di San Salvi 12, 50135 Florence, Italy. Electronic address: eva.bei.0209@gmail.com.
  • Argiropoulos D; Department of Humanities, Social Sciences and Cultural Industries, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
  • Van Herwegen J; Department of Psychology and Human Development, UCL, Institute of Education, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Incognito O; Department of Education, Languages, Intercultures, Literatures and Psychology (FORLIPSI), University of Florence, Via di San Salvi 12, 50135 Florence, Italy.
  • Menichetti L; Department of Education, Languages, Intercultures, Literatures and Psychology (FORLIPSI), University of Florence, Via di San Salvi 12, 50135 Florence, Italy.
  • Tarchi C; Department of Education, Languages, Intercultures, Literatures and Psychology (FORLIPSI), University of Florence, Via di San Salvi 12, 50135 Florence, Italy.
  • Pecini C; Department of Education, Languages, Intercultures, Literatures and Psychology (FORLIPSI), University of Florence, Via di San Salvi 12, 50135 Florence, Italy.
Trends Neurosci Educ ; 34: 100219, 2024 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38499407
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Neuromyths are commonly held misconceptions about the brain, often generated by a misunderstanding of scientifically established facts. To date, limited research has explored the pervalence of neuromyths about neurodevelopmental disorders in the teacher population.

METHOD:

The current study investigated the prevalence of teachers' general and neurodevelopmental neuromyths among 820 Italian teachers.

RESULTS:

Italian teachers correctly identified 73% of general neuromyths and 70% of neurodevelopmental neuromyths. The difference between general and neurodevelopmental neuromyths endorsement was significant. Frequency of accessing relevant information emerged as a protective factor. A mediation analysis showed that higher need for cognition was significantly associated with a higher frequency of accessing relevant information about the brain, which in turn led to lower endorsement of neuromyths.

CONCLUSION:

In line with our findings, we suggest that teachers can benefit from neuroeducation initiatives aimed to enhance neuroscience literacy in both the initial education and continuous professional development of teachers.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pessoal de Educação / Professores Escolares Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Trends Neurosci Educ Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pessoal de Educação / Professores Escolares Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Trends Neurosci Educ Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article