Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Fluid-filled versus sensor-tipped pressure guidewires for FFR and Pd/Pa measurement; PW-COMPARE study.
Eerdekens, Rob; Tonino, Pim A L; Zimmermann, Frederik M; Teeuwen, Koen; Vlaar, Pieter-Jan; de Waard, Guus A; van Royen, Niels; van Nunen, Lokien X.
Afiliação
  • Eerdekens R; Heart Center, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
  • Tonino PAL; Heart Center, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
  • Zimmermann FM; Heart Center, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
  • Teeuwen K; Heart Center, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
  • Vlaar PJ; Heart Center, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
  • de Waard GA; Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • van Royen N; Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • van Nunen LX; Heart Center, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: lokien.vannunen@radboudumc.nl.
Int J Cardiol ; 406: 131998, 2024 Jul 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38555057
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Fluid-filled pressure guidewires are unaffected by the previously inevitable hydrostatic pressure gradient (HPG). This study aimed to compare simultaneous pressure measurements with fluid-filled and sensor-tipped pressure guidewires.

METHODS:

Fifty patients underwent fractional flow reserve (FFR) and Pd/Pa measurement with a fluid-filled and a sensor-tipped pressure guidewire simultaneously. To assess maneuverability, patients were randomized with respect to which pressure guidewire was used to cross the lesion first. Lateral fluoroscopy was used to estimate height difference between catheter tip and distal wire position (and thus HPG). Agreement between pressure measurements was studied.

RESULTS:

Measurements were performed in LM (4% (n = 2)), LAD (44% (n = 22)), LCX (26% (n = 13)), and RCA (26% (n = 13)). Simultaneous pressure measurements showed excellent agreement (mean FFR difference - 0.01 ± 0.03 (r = 0.959, p < 0.001), mean Pd/Pa difference - 0.01 ± 0.04 (r = 0.929, p < 0.001)). FFR was ≤0.80 in 42.6% (n = 20) with fluid-filled FFR measurements versus 46.8% (n = 22) by sensor-tipped FFR measurements. Mean height difference was 15 ± 34 mm, and strongly dependent on the coronary artery (LAD 45 ± 10 mm, LCX -23 ± 16 mm, RCA -13 ± 17 mm). There was a strong correlation between height difference and difference in pressure ratios between sensor-tipped and fluid-filled pressure guidewires (FFR r = -0.850, p < 0.001; Pd/Par = -0.641, p < 0.001). Largest FFR differences were present in the LAD (-0.04 ± 0.02). After HPG correction, mean difference between HPG-corrected sensor-tipped FFR and fluid-filled FFR was 0.00 ± 0.02, mean Pd/Pa difference was 0.01 ± 0.03.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study shows excellent overall correlation between FFR and Pd/Pa measurements with both pressure guidewires. Differences measured with fluid-filled and sensor-tipped pressure guidewires are vessel-specific and attributable to hydrostatic pressure gradients (NCT04802681).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cateterismo Cardíaco / Reserva Fracionada de Fluxo Miocárdico Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Int J Cardiol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cateterismo Cardíaco / Reserva Fracionada de Fluxo Miocárdico Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Int J Cardiol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda