Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Biomechanical analysis of a trans-discal, multi-level stabilization screw (MLSS) at the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) of long posterior thoracolumbar instrumentations.
Collins, Andrew P; Shah, Anoli A; Shekouhi, Niloufar; Goel, Vijay K; Theologis, Alekos A.
Afiliação
  • Collins AP; Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Shah AA; Engineering Center for Orthopaedic Research Excellence (E-CORE), Departments of Bioengineering and Surgery, Colleges of Engineering and Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
  • Shekouhi N; Engineering Center for Orthopaedic Research Excellence (E-CORE), Departments of Bioengineering and Surgery, Colleges of Engineering and Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
  • Goel VK; Engineering Center for Orthopaedic Research Excellence (E-CORE), Departments of Bioengineering and Surgery, Colleges of Engineering and Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
  • Theologis AA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, San Francisco (UCSF), University of California, 500 Parnassus Ave, MUW 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA, USA. alekos.theologis@ucsf.edu.
Spine Deform ; 12(4): 953-959, 2024 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38578598
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate proximal junctional biomechanics of a MLSS relative to traditional pedicle screw fixation at the proximal extent of T10-pelvis posterior instrumentation constructs (T10-p PSF).

METHODS:

A previously validated three-dimensional osseoligamentous spinopelvic finite element (FE) model was used to compare proximal junctional range-of-motion (ROM), vertebral body stresses, and discal biomechanics between two groups (1) T10-p with a T10-11 MLSS ("T10-11 MLSS") and (2) T10-p with a traditional T10 pedicle screw ("Traditional T10-PS").

RESULTS:

The T10-11 MLSS had a 5% decrease in T9 cortical bone stress compared to Traditional T10-PS. Conversely, the T10 and T11 bone stresses increased by 46% and 98%, respectively, with T10-11 MLSS compared to Traditional T10-PS. Annular stresses and intradiscal pressures (IDP) were similar at T9-T10 between constructs. At the T10-11 disc, T10-11 MLSS decreased annular stresses by 29% and IDP by 48% compared to Traditional T10-PS. Adjacent ROM (T8-9 & T9-10) were similar between T10-11 MLSS and Traditional T10-PS. T10-11 MLSS had 39% greater ROM at T10-11 and 23% less ROM at T11-12 compared to Traditional T10-PS.

CONCLUSIONS:

In this FE analysis, a T10-11 MLSS at the proximal extent of T10-pelvis posterior instrumentation resulted in increased T10 and T11 cortical bone stresses, decreased discal annular stress and IDP and increased ROM at T10-11, and no change in ROM at the adjacent level. Given the complex and multifactorial nature of proximal junctional kyphosis, these results require additional biomechanical and clinical evaluations to determine the clinical utility of MLSS on the proximal junctions of thoracolumbar posterior instrumented fusions.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fusão Vertebral / Vértebras Torácicas / Amplitude de Movimento Articular / Análise de Elementos Finitos / Parafusos Pediculares / Vértebras Lombares Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Spine Deform Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fusão Vertebral / Vértebras Torácicas / Amplitude de Movimento Articular / Análise de Elementos Finitos / Parafusos Pediculares / Vértebras Lombares Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Spine Deform Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos