Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Gene Therapy and Spinal Fusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Available Data.
Cottrill, Ethan; Pennington, Zach; Sattah, Nathan; Jing, Crystal; Salven, Dave; Johnson, Eli; Downey, Max; Varghese, Shyni; Rocos, Brett; Richardson, William.
Afiliação
  • Cottrill E; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: ethan.cottrill@duke.edu.
  • Pennington Z; Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Sattah N; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Jing C; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Salven D; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Johnson E; Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Downey M; Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NY, USA.
  • Varghese S; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Rocos B; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Richardson W; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA.
World Neurosurg ; 186: 219-234.e4, 2024 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38583566
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To analyze the extant literature describing the application of gene therapy to spinal fusion.

METHODS:

A systematic review of the English-language literature was performed. The search query was designed to include all published studies examining gene therapy approaches to promote spinal fusion. Approaches were classified as ex vivo (delivery of genetically modified cells) or in vivo (delivery of growth factors via vectors). The primary endpoint was fusion rate. Random effects meta-analyses were performed to calculate the overall odds ratio (OR) of fusion using a gene therapy approach and overall fusion rate. Subgroup analyses of fusion rate were also performed for each gene therapy approach.

RESULTS:

Of 1179 results, 35 articles met criteria for inclusion (all preclinical), of which 26 utilized ex vivo approaches and 9 utilized in vivo approaches. Twenty-seven articles (431 animals) were included in the meta-analysis. Gene therapy use was associated with significantly higher fusion rates (OR 77; 95% confidence interval {CI} [31, 192]; P < 0.001); ex vivo strategies had a greater effect (OR 136) relative to in vivo strategies (OR 18) (P = 0.017). The overall fusion rate using a gene therapy approach was 80% (95% CI [62%, 93%]; P < 0.001); overall fusion rates were significantly higher in subjects treated with ex vivo compared to in vivo strategies (90% vs. 42%; P = 0.011). For both ex vivo and in vivo approaches, the effect of gene therapy on fusion was independent of animal model.

CONCLUSIONS:

Gene therapy may augment spinal fusion; however, future investigation in clinical populations is necessary.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fusão Vertebral / Terapia Genética Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: World Neurosurg Assunto da revista: NEUROCIRURGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fusão Vertebral / Terapia Genética Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: World Neurosurg Assunto da revista: NEUROCIRURGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article