Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Combined cortical thickness and blink reflex recovery cycle to differentiate essential tremor with and without resting tremor.
Calomino, Camilla; Quattrone, Andrea; Bianco, Maria Giovanna; Nisticò, Rita; Buonocore, Jolanda; Crasà, Marianna; Vaccaro, Maria Grazia; Sarica, Alessia; Quattrone, Aldo.
Afiliação
  • Calomino C; Neuroscience Research Center, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
  • Quattrone A; Neuroscience Research Center, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
  • Bianco MG; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Institute of Neurology, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
  • Nisticò R; Neuroscience Research Center, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
  • Buonocore J; Neuroscience Research Center, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
  • Crasà M; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Institute of Neurology, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
  • Vaccaro MG; Neuroscience Research Center, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
  • Sarica A; Neuroscience Research Center, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
  • Quattrone A; Neuroscience Research Center, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
Front Neurol ; 15: 1372262, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38585347
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To investigate the performance of structural MRI cortical and subcortical morphometric data combined with blink-reflex recovery cycle (BRrc) values using machine learning (ML) models in distinguishing between essential tremor (ET) with resting tremor (rET) and classic ET.

Methods:

We enrolled 47 ET, 43 rET patients and 45 healthy controls (HC). All participants underwent brain 3 T-MRI and BRrc examination at different interstimulus intervals (ISIs, 100-300 msec). MRI data (cortical thickness, volumes, surface area, roughness, mean curvature and subcortical volumes) were extracted using Freesurfer on T1-weighted images. We employed two decision tree-based ML classification algorithms (eXtreme Gradient Boosting [XGBoost] and Random Forest) combining MRI data and BRrc values to differentiate between rET and ET patients.

Results:

ML models based exclusively on MRI features reached acceptable performance (AUC 0.85-0.86) in differentiating rET from ET patients and from HC. Similar performances were obtained by ML models based on BRrc data (AUC 0.81-0.82 in rET vs. ET and AUC 0.88-0.89 in rET vs. HC). ML models combining imaging data (cortical thickness, surface, roughness, and mean curvature) together with BRrc values showed the highest classification performance in distinguishing between rET and ET patients, reaching AUC of 0.94 ± 0.05. The improvement in classification performances when BRrc data were added to imaging features was confirmed by both ML algorithms.

Conclusion:

This study highlights the usefulness of adding a simple electrophysiological assessment such as BRrc to MRI cortical morphometric features for accurately distinguishing rET from ET patients, paving the way for a better classification of these ET syndromes.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Neurol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Neurol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália