A case for integrating self-compassion interventions targeting shame and self-criticism into eating disorder treatment: Commentary on Paranjothy and Wade.

ABSTRACT

Paranjothy and Wade's (2024) meta-analysis revealed that disordered eating was robustly and consistently associated with greater self-criticism and lower self-compassion across samples. It is well known that even evidence-based treatments for eating disorders (EDs) do not produce long-lasting effects for many patients. Additionally, it is unclear whether existing "mainstream" evidence-based ED treatments effectively reduce shame and self-criticism and increase self-compassion, even when they intend to do so. In this commentary, we assert that Paranjothy and Wade's (2024) findings should inform the integration of self-compassion interventions within ED treatment. We argue that shame, a related but distinct construct, should be strongly considered as a primary intervention target in ED interventions that seek to reduce self-criticism and increase self-compassion. We hypothesize that directly addressing shame and bolstering self-compassion at the start of ED treatment may foster higher engagement and more durable effects. We introduce the potential for adjunctive self-compassion interventions to reduce shame and self-criticism, and enhance self-compassion, alongside or within existing ED treatments. Because self-criticism and shame are shared correlates of EDs and commonly co-occurring psychopathology, we contend with the possibility that self-compassion interventions may produce transdiagnostic effects. Shame, self-criticism, and self-compassion are important intervention targets to explore in future research.