Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bench Press Range-of-Motion and Velocity-based Repetition Control: Effects on Ballistic Push-up Performance in Males.
Collins, Kyle S; Bradley, Adam P; Christensen, Bryan K; Waldera, Roman W; Klawitter, Lukus A; Ogren, Liam; Salatto, R W.
Afiliação
  • Collins KS; Department of Health, Nutrition, and Exercise Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.
  • Bradley AP; Department of Health, Nutrition, and Exercise Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.
  • Christensen BK; Department of Health, Nutrition, and Exercise Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.
  • Waldera RW; School of Health and Consumer Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, USA.
  • Klawitter LA; School of Health and Human Performance, Northern Michigan University, Marquette, MI, USA.
  • Ogren L; Department of Health, Nutrition, and Exercise Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.
  • Salatto RW; Department of Kinesiology, Vanguard University, Costa Mesa, CA, USA.
Int J Exerc Sci ; 17(1): 38-53, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38665164
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the ballistic push-up (BPU) is responsive to post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) after a bench press conditioning exercise using velocity-based repetition control. Additionally, we aimed to evaluate the effects of range of motion (ROM) conditions on subsequent BPU performance. In a randomized crossover design, 18 males performed two conditions (full ROM and self-selected partial ROM) of bench press at 80% of their 1RM until mean concentric velocity dropped 10%. Each participant performed two pre- and six post-test BPUs to assess the PAPE effect. Paired sample t-tests assessed bench press performance measures. Multiple two-way repeated measures ANOVAs assessed differences in flight time, impulse, and peak power for the pre- and post-test BPUs. No significant differences existed between ROM conditions for total repetitions, volume load, or peak velocity. Compared to partial ROM, full ROM showed greater displacement (0.42 ± 0.05 vs. 0.34 ± 0.05 m), work (331.99 ± 67.72 vs. 270.92 ± 61.42 J), and mean velocity (0.46 ± 0.09 vs. 0.44 ± 0.08 m/s). Neither bench press ROM condition enhanced the BPU and were detrimental in some cases. Several time points showed partial ROM (flight time 2 min post, impulse 12 min post, peak power 12 min post) significantly greater than full ROM, possibly indicating less fatigue accumulation. The BPU may require a different stimulus or may not be practical for PAPE effects in college-aged males. Partial ROM can be an alternative that achieves similar peak velocities while requiring less overall work.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Int J Exerc Sci Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Int J Exerc Sci Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos