Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Widespread Misperceptions Among U.S. Adults About Tobacco Company Engagement in Black and African American Communities.
Sterling, Kymberle L; Ganz, Ollie; Wackowski, Olivia A; Glasser, Allison M; Villanti, Andrea C.
Afiliação
  • Sterling KL; Rutgers Institute for Nicotine and Tobacco Studies, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
  • Ganz O; Department of Health Behavior, Society and Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
  • Wackowski OA; Rutgers Institute for Nicotine and Tobacco Studies, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
  • Glasser AM; Department of Health Behavior, Society and Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
  • Villanti AC; Rutgers Institute for Nicotine and Tobacco Studies, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 2024 May 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38692654
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Menthol cigarettes and flavored cigars (MC/FC) bring profits to U.S. tobacco companies at the cost of Black/African American (B/AA) lives. This exploratory cross-sectional study describes perceptions of tobacco company engagement and activities in B/AA communities related to MC/FC. AIMS AND

METHODS:

Among 2307 U.S. adults aged 18-45 surveyed in 2022, six items addressed beliefs about tobacco company funding of B/AA community organizations, payment of B/AA lobbyists to oppose public health policies, support of health equity efforts in B/AA communities, and targeted marketing of MC/FC in B/AA communities. Adjusted proportions were calculated for each belief overall and by race and cigarette smoking status.

RESULTS:

Among all adults, 37% believed that tobacco companies deny the harms of MC/FCs, 20% believed they pay Black lobbyists to oppose health policies, and 12% believed they fund Black community organizations. Compared with non-B/AA adults, a higher proportion of B/AA adults believed that tobacco companies target Black communities with MC/FC marketing (62% vs. 46%). More adult smokers (ie, menthol or non-MC) than nonsmokers thought that tobacco companies support health equity efforts and did not target Black communities with MC/FC marketing nor deny the harms of MC/FCs to B/AA communities.

CONCLUSIONS:

Few B/AAs and adult smokers believed that tobacco companies used B/AA organizations and lobbyists to oppose MC/FC policies in the B/AA community as well as reject MC/FC's harmfulness. Culturally tailored and community-engaged communication efforts are needed to correct disinformation about MC/FC tobacco companies' engagement and activities in B/AA communities among B/AA and menthol cigarette smokers. IMPLICATIONS Tobacco companies have a history of predatory marketing that promotes flavored tobacco products to Black/African American (B/AA) individuals and more recently has spread disinformation to dissuade policy support for menthol cigarette/flavored cigar (MC/FC) bans. It is unclear what are the perceptions of tobacco company engagement and activities in B/AA communities related to MC/FC. Our study shows that B/AA adults and current cigarette smokers hold misperceptions about tobacco companies' role in spreading disinformation about MC/FC. This study identified beliefs about the industry's role in funding B/AA organizations and lobbyists who oppose policy, as well as the industry's denial of menthol cigarette and flavored cigar harms as potential messaging targets for communication efforts designed to correct disinformation about MC/FC policies among B/AA and those who currently smoke MC.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Nicotine Tob Res Assunto da revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Nicotine Tob Res Assunto da revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos