Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What is the definition of stone dust and how does it compare with clinically insignificant residual fragments? A comprehensive review.
Panthier, Frederic; Kwok, Jia-Lun; Tzou, David T; Monga, Manoj; Traxer, Olivier; Keller, Etienne X.
Afiliação
  • Panthier F; GRC No 20, Groupe de Recherche Clinique sur la Lithiase Urinaire, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne Université, 75020, Paris, France. fredericpanthier@gmail.com.
  • Kwok JL; Service d'Urologie, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne Université, 4 Rue de la Chine, 75020, Paris, France. fredericpanthier@gmail.com.
  • Tzou DT; UMR 8006 CNRS-Arts et Métiers ParisTech, PIMM, 151 bd de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France. fredericpanthier@gmail.com.
  • Monga M; Progressive Endourological Association for Research and Leading Solutions (PEARLS), Paris, France. fredericpanthier@gmail.com.
  • Traxer O; Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Keller EX; Department of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 292, 2024 May 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704492
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

During endoscopic stone surgery, HolmiumYAG (HoYAG) and Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) technologies allow to pulverize urinary stones into fine particles, ie DUST. Yet, currently there is no consensus on the exact definition of DUST. This review aimed to define stone DUST and Clinically Insignificant Residual Fragments (CIRF).

METHODS:

Embase, MEDLINE (PubMed) and Cochrane databases were searched for both in vitro and in vivo articles relating to DUST and CIRF definitions, in November 2023, using keyword combinations "dust", "stones", "urinary calculi", "urolithiasis", "residual fragments", "dusting", "fragments", "lasers" and "clinical insignificant residual fragments".

RESULTS:

DUST relates to the fine pulverization of urinary stones, defined in vitro as particles spontaneously floating with a sedimentation duration ≥ 2 sec and suited for aspiration through a 3.6Fr-working channel (WC) of a flexible ureteroscope (FURS). Generally, an upper size limit of 250 µm seems to agree with the definition of DUST. HoYAG with and without "Moses Technology", TFL and the recent pulsed-ThuliumYAG (pTmYAG) can produce DUST, but no perioperative technology can currently measure DUST size. The TFL and pTmYAG achieve better dusting compared to HoYAG. CIRF relates to residual fragments (RF) that are not associated with imminent stone-related events loin pain, acute renal colic, medical or interventional retreatment. CIRF size definition has decreased from older studies based on Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL) (≤ 4 mm) to more recent studies based on FURS (≤ 2 mm) and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy(PCNL) (≤ 4 mm). RF ≤ 2 mm are associated with lower stone recurrence, regrowth and clinical events rates. While CIRF should be evaluated postoperatively using Non-Contrast Computed Tomography(NCCT), there is no consensus on the best diagnostic modality to assess the presence and quantity of DUST.

CONCLUSION:

DUST and CIRF refer to independent entities. DUST is defined in vitro by a stone particle size criteria of 250 µm, translating clinically as particles able to be fully aspirated through a 3.6Fr-WC without blockage. CIRF relates to ≤ 2 RF on postoperative NCCT.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cálculos Urinários / Ureteroscopia Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: World J Urol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cálculos Urinários / Ureteroscopia Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: World J Urol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França