Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Research on prediction of coal water medium separation effect based on multi-models.
Chen, Peng; Wang, Chengyong; Wang, Shiwei; Zhang, Chenhu; Li, Ziwen.
Afiliação
  • Chen P; School of Mining and Mechanical Engineering, Liupanshui Normal University, Liupanshui 553004, China.
  • Wang C; School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China.
  • Wang S; Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory of Coal Clean Utilization, Liupanshui Normal University, Liupanshui, 553004, China.
  • Zhang C; School of Mining and Mechanical Engineering, Liupanshui Normal University, Liupanshui 553004, China.
  • Li Z; Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory of Coal Clean Utilization, Liupanshui Normal University, Liupanshui, 553004, China.
Heliyon ; 10(10): e31038, 2024 May 30.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38770344
ABSTRACT
To improve the separation efficiency of raw coal and ensure clean use, the accurate calculation of the partition coefficients (PCs) in coal water medium sorting is required. Single models have been used to predict the partition coefficient (PC) for decades, but their accuracy remains constrained. This study proposes a multi-model (MM) calculation method based on the Gompertz model (GM), the Logistic model (LM), the Arctangent model (AM), and the Approximate formula (AFM) to improve the accuracy of the predicted coal water medium sorting PCs. Four groups of coal samples and two specific cases were used to verify the accuracy of the MM calculation method. The PCs of the MM method had a minimal Ef (0.91-8.84), a maximal R2 (0.9648-0.9994), a maximal F-value (199.17-11352.31), and the highest significance of all the models. The MM method was found to be the most suitable of all the models for predicting any coal water medium separation process. Further, when calculating the PC for cleaned coal ash, the separation density of MM is closer to the actual separation density than that of either the GM, LM, AM, or AFM models. The MM method, therefore, produces more accurate results compared to a single model. MM is expected to predict the PC based on the required cleaned coal ash, and then regulate the sorting density to improve the production efficiency.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Heliyon Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Heliyon Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China