Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination among urogynecology patients.
Spector, Sean; Shah, Shanaya; Ul Rasool, Muhammad Haseeb; Hilt, Elizabeth; Goldstein, Howard; Meade, Jason; Korn, Electra; Lipetskaia, Lioudmila.
Afiliação
  • Spector S; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cooper University Healthcare, Camden, NJ, USA.
  • Shah S; Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ, USA.
  • Ul Rasool MH; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cooper University Healthcare, Camden, NJ, USA.
  • Hilt E; Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ, USA.
  • Goldstein H; Center for Urogynecology and Pelvic Surgery, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE, USA.
  • Meade J; UroGynecology Specialty Center, Fresno, CA, USA.
  • Korn E; Mount Sinai South Nassau, Oceanside, NY, USA.
  • Lipetskaia L; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cooper University Healthcare, Camden, NJ, USA.
Heliyon ; 10(10): e30092, 2024 May 30.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38778988
ABSTRACT

Objective:

Urogynecology patients skew older and often require intimate exams to treat non-life-threatening conditions, thus making care particularly susceptible to the effects of COVID-19. We aim to understand COVID-19 vaccination attitudes amongst urogynecology patients during the pandemic, which has adversely affected healthcare delivery, to identify measures that can be undertaken to improve care going forward. Study

design:

Cross-sectional surveys of urogynecology patients were conducted in three different states (Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania) between March and August 2021. Demographics, vaccination status, and COVID-19 attitudes were analyzed. Chi-square tests investigated group differences between vaccine-hesitant and unhesitant subjects.

Results:

Out of 158 surveys, eighty-three percent of respondents were vaccinated or planning to get vaccinated. Older age and regular flu vaccination predicted COVID-19 vaccination. Ninety-three percent of subjects were comfortable attending in-person visits. However, vaccine-hesitant individuals were less comfortable attending in-person and were significantly less likely to be comforted by clinic interventions, such as masking. Hesitant and unhesitant groups trusted doctors or medical professionals most for their source of COVID-19 information.

Conclusions:

Urogynecology patients mirror the general older population's COVID-19 vaccination attitudes, with distinct differences between hesitant and unhesitant groups. Vaccine-hesitant subjects appear less comfortable coming to in-person visits and less comforted by possible interventions, posing a difficult obstacle for clinics to overcome. High levels of patient trust suggest healthcare providers can play a crucial role in encouraging COVID-19 vaccination and combating misinformation.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Heliyon Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Heliyon Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos