Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma depends on response to neoadjuvant therapy.
Carpenter, Elizabeth L; Van Decar, Spencer G; McCarthy, Patrick M; Valdera, Franklin A; Adams, Alexandra M; O'Shea, Anne E; Smolinsky, Todd; Thomas, Katryna; Clifton, Guy T; Newhook, Timothy E; Peoples, George E; Nelson, Daniel W; Vreeland, Timothy J.
Afiliação
  • Carpenter EL; Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
  • Van Decar SG; Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
  • McCarthy PM; Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
  • Valdera FA; Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
  • Adams AM; Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
  • O'Shea AE; Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
  • Smolinsky T; Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
  • Thomas K; Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
  • Clifton GT; Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
  • Newhook TE; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Peoples GE; Cancer Vaccine Development Program, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
  • Nelson DW; William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, Texas, USA.
  • Vreeland TJ; Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
J Surg Oncol ; 130(1): 109-116, 2024 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38801055
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The benefit of adjuvant therapy (AT) remains unclear in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and surgical resection.

METHODS:

The 2019 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with non-metastatic PDAC who received NAT followed by pancreaticoduodenectomy. Only patients with data regarding receipt of AT were included. Patients were classified if they had nodal down-staging specifically, or any downstaging (Tumor, Nodal, or overall). Propensity score matching (PSM) adjusted for pretreatment covariate imbalance between groups. The weighted Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to estimate the cumulative survival.

RESULTS:

After exclusion criteria and PSM, a total of 2784 patients remained; 1689 (60.7%) received AT and 1095 (39.3%) did not receive AT. Among all, those with additional AT had a significantly improved overall survival (OS) (p < 0.001). Upon evaluation of patients without downstaging after NAT, those who received AT had improved OS (no nodal downstaging or any downstaging; p = 0.002; p = 0.001). When evaluating patients with downstaging after NAT, those receiving AT did not have improved OS (nodal downstaging or any downstaging p = 0.352; p = 0.99).

CONCLUSION:

Response to NAT appears to correlate with the benefit of AT following pancreaticoduodenectomy; patients who have a favorable response to NAT may not benefit from AT.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Pancreaticoduodenectomia / Terapia Neoadjuvante / Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Oncol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Pancreaticoduodenectomia / Terapia Neoadjuvante / Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Oncol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos