Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Telephone triage of chest pain in out-of-hours primary care: external validation of a symptom-based prediction rule to rule out acute coronary syndromes.
Manten, Amy; Harskamp, Ralf E; Busschers, Wim B; Moll van Charante, Eric P; Himmelreich, Jelle C L.
Afiliação
  • Manten A; Department of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
  • Harskamp RE; Amsterdam Public Health, Personalized Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Busschers WB; Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Moll van Charante EP; Department of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
  • Himmelreich JCL; Amsterdam Public Health, Personalized Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Fam Pract ; 2024 May 27.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38801727
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Telephone triage is pivotal for evaluating the urgency of patient care, and in the Netherlands, the Netherlands Triage Standard (NTS) demonstrates moderate discrimination for chest pain. To address this, the Safety First Prediction Rule (SFPR) was developed to improve the safety of ruling out acute coronary syndrome (ACS) during telephone triage.

METHODS:

We conducted an external validation of the SFPR using data from the TRACE study, a retrospective cohort study in out-of-hours primary care. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy assessment for ACS, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and major events within 6 weeks. Moreover, we compared its performance with that of the NTS algorithm.

RESULTS:

Among 1404 included patients (57.3% female, 6.8% ACS, 8.6% MACE), the SFPR demonstrated good discrimination for ACS (C-statistic 0.79; 95%-CI 0.75-0.83) and MACE (C-statistic 0.79; 95%-CI 0.0.76-0.82). Calibration was satisfactory, with overestimation observed in high-risk patients for ACS. The SFPR (risk threshold 2.5%) trended toward higher sensitivity (95.8% vs. 86.3%) and negative predictive value (99.3% vs. 97.6%) with a lower negative likelihood ratio (0.10 vs. 0.34) than the NTS algorithm.

CONCLUSION:

The SFPR proved robust for risk stratification in patients with acute chest pain seeking out-of-hours primary care in the Netherlands. Further prospective validation and implementation are warranted to refine and establish the rule's clinical utility.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Fam Pract Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Fam Pract Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article