Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Not first-line antihypertensive agents, but still effective-The efficacy and safety of imidazoline receptor agonists: A network meta-analysis.
Érszegi, András; Viola, Réka; Bahar, Muh Akbar; Tóth, Barbara; Fejes, Imola; Vágvölgyi, Anna; Csupor, Dezso.
Afiliação
  • Érszegi A; Faculty of Pharmacy, Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
  • Viola R; Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical Centre, Central Pharmacy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
  • Bahar MA; Faculty of Pharmacy, Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
  • Tóth B; Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical Centre, Central Pharmacy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
  • Fejes I; Faculty of Pharmacy, Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
  • Vágvölgyi A; Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar, Indonesia.
  • Csupor D; Faculty of Pharmacy, Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Pharmacol Res Perspect ; 12(3): e1215, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38807350
ABSTRACT
Cardiovascular disorders are the leading cause of death in the world. Many organ diseases (kidney, heart, and brain) are substantially more prone to develop in people with hypertension. In the treatment of hypertension, first-line medications are recommended, while imidazoline receptor agonists are not first-line antihypertensives. Our goal was to conduct a network meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of imidazoline receptor agonists. The meta-analysis was performed following the PRISMA guidelines using the PICOS format, considering the CONSORT recommendations. Studies were collected from four databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase. A total of 5960 articles were found. After filtering, 27 studies remained eligible for network meta-analysis. Moxonidine reduced blood pressure in sitting position statistically significantly after 8 weeks of treatment (SBP MD 23.80; 95% CI 17.45-30.15; DBP MD 10.90; 95% CI 8.45-13.35) compared to placebo. Moreover, moxonidine reduced blood pressure more effectively than enalapril; however, this difference was not significant (SBP MD 3.10; 95% CI -2.60-8.80; DBP MD 1.30; 95% CI -1.25-3.85). Dry mouth was experienced as a side effect in the case of all imidazoline receptor agonists. After 8 weeks of treatment, the appearance of dry mouth was highest with clonidine (OR 9.27 95% CI 4.70-18.29) and lowest with rilmenidine (OR 6.46 95% CI 0.85-49.13) compared to placebo. Somnolence was less frequent with moxonidine compared to rilmenidine (OR 0.63 95% CI 0.17-2.31). Imidazoline receptor agonists were nearly as effective as the first-line drugs in the examined studies. However, their utility as antihypertensives is limited due to their side effects. As a result, they are not first-line antihypertensives and should not be used in monotherapy. However, in the case of resistant hypertension, they are a viable option. According to our findings, from the point of view of safety and efficacy, moxonidine appears to be the best choice among imidazoline receptor agonists.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Receptores de Imidazolinas / Hipertensão / Imidazóis / Anti-Hipertensivos Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Pharmacol Res Perspect Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Hungria

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Receptores de Imidazolinas / Hipertensão / Imidazóis / Anti-Hipertensivos Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Pharmacol Res Perspect Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Hungria