Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Personalized screening before subcutaneous cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: Usefulness and outcomes in clinical practice-the S-ICD screening SIS prospective study.
de Guillebon, Maxime; Garcia, Rodrigue; Debeugny, Stéphane; Bader, Hugues; Probst, Vincent; Bidegain, Nicolas; Narayanan, Kumar; Mansourati, Jacques; Menet, Aymeric; Pierre, Ollitrault; Marquié, Christelle; Guy-Moyat, Benoît; Mondoly, Pierre; Chevalier, Philippe; Badenco, Nicolas; Behar, Nathalie; Jesel-Morel, Laurence; Pierre, Bertrand; Lellouche, Nicolas; Deharo, Jean-Claude; Jacon, Peggy; Anselme, Frédéric; Boveda, Serge; Marijon, Eloi.
Afiliação
  • de Guillebon M; Department of Cardiology, Hospital of Pau, Pau, France.
  • Garcia R; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
  • Debeugny S; Department of Research, Hospital of Pau, Pau, France.
  • Bader H; Department of Cardiology, Hospital of Pau, Pau, France.
  • Probst V; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France.
  • Bidegain N; Department of Cardiology, Hospital of Pau, Pau, France.
  • Narayanan K; Division of Cardiology, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France; Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Medicover Hospital, Hyderabad, India.
  • Mansourati J; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Brest, Brest, France.
  • Menet A; Department of Cardiology, Hospital of Saint Philibert, Lomme, France.
  • Pierre O; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France.
  • Marquié C; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Lille, Lille, France.
  • Guy-Moyat B; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Limoges, Limoges, France.
  • Mondoly P; Department of Cardiology, Center University Hospital of Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
  • Chevalier P; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Lyon, Lyon, France.
  • Badenco N; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of la Pitié Salpétrière, Paris, France.
  • Behar N; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Pontchaillou, Rennes, France.
  • Jesel-Morel L; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
  • Pierre B; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France.
  • Lellouche N; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Créteil, Créteil, France.
  • Deharo JC; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Marseille, Marseille, France.
  • Jacon P; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
  • Anselme F; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Rouen, Rouen, France.
  • Boveda S; Department of Cardiology, Pasteur Clinic, Toulouse, France.
  • Marijon E; Division of Cardiology, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France. Electronic address: eloi_marijon@yahoo.fr.
Heart Rhythm ; 2024 May 27.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38810921
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Electrocardiographic screening before subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation is unsuccessful in around 10% of cases. A personalized screening method, by slightly moving the electrodes, to obtain a better R/T ratio has been described to overcome traditional screening failure.

OBJECTIVE:

The objectives of the SIS study were to assess to what extent a personalized screening method improves eligibility for S-ICD implantation and to evaluate the inappropriate shock rate after such screening success.

METHODS:

All consecutive patients eligible for an S-ICD implantation were prospectively recruited across 20 French centers between December 2019 and January 2022. In case of traditional screening failure, patients received a second personalized screening. If at least 1 vector was positive, the personalized screening was considered successful, and the patient was eligible for implantation.

RESULTS:

The study included 474 patients (mean age, 50.4 ± 14.1 years; 77.4% men). Traditional screening was successful in 456 (96.2%) cases. This figure rose to 98.3% (n = 466; P = .002) when personalized screening was performed. All patients implanted after successful personalized screening had correct signal detection on initial device interrogation. Nevertheless, after 1-year follow-up, 3 of the 7 patients (43%) implanted with personalized screening experienced inappropriate shock vs 18 of the 427 patients (4.2%) with traditional screening and S-ICD implantation (P = .003).

CONCLUSION:

Traditional S-ICD screening was successful in our study in a high proportion of patients. Considering the small improvement in success of screening and a higher rate of inappropriate shock, a strategy of personalized screening cannot be routinely recommended. CLINICALTRIALS gov identifier NCT04101253.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Heart Rhythm Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Heart Rhythm Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França