Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimal range of gestational weight gain for singleton pregnant women: a cohort study based on Chinese specific body mass index categories.
Jia, Yin; Jiang, Haili; Fu, Yuhui; Li, Yue; Wang, Huili.
Afiliação
  • Jia Y; School of General Practice and Continuing Education, Capital Medical University, No. 10 You An Men Wai Xi Tou Tiao, Beijing, 100069, China.
  • Jiang H; Department of Obstetrics, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100026, China.
  • Fu Y; Department of Obstetrics, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100026, China.
  • Li Y; Department of Obstetrics, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100026, China.
  • Wang H; School of General Practice and Continuing Education, Capital Medical University, No. 10 You An Men Wai Xi Tou Tiao, Beijing, 100069, China. wanghuili@ccmu.edu.cn.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 399, 2024 May 31.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38822232
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The purpose was to explore the optimal proportion of GWG in Chinese singleton pregnant women according to Chinese specific body mass index (BMI) categories.

METHODS:

A retrospective cohort study with 16,977 singleton pregnant women was conducted. Among the including subjects, 2/3 of which were randomly imported into the training set for calculating the optimal GWG ranges using the percentile method, the Odd Ratio (OR) method, and the combined risk curve method. And another third of the subjects were used to evaluate the GWG ranges obtained. The detection rate of adverse outcomes of pregnant women was used to evaluate the applicability of GWG obtained. The range corresponding to the lowest detection rate is the recommended GWG range in this study.

RESULTS:

According to the percentile method, the suitable GWG of pregnant women with underweight, normal weight, overweight or obesity before pregnancy were 12.0 ∼ 17.5 kg, 11.0 ∼ 17.0 kg, and 9.0 ∼ 15.5 kg, respectively. According to the OR method, the suitable GWG range were 11 ∼ 18 kg, 7 ∼ 11 kg, and 6 ∼ 8 kg, respectively. According to the combined risk curve method, the suitable GWG range were 11.2 ∼ 17.2 kg, 3.6 ∼ 11.5 kg, and - 5.2 ∼ 7.0 kg, respectively. When the GWG for different BMI categories were 11 ∼ 18 kg, 7 ∼ 11 kg, and 6 ∼ 8 kg, the pregnant women have the lowest detection rate of adverse maternal and infant outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS:

The recommended GWG based on this study for underweight, normal, overweight or obese pregnant women were 11 ∼ 18 kg, 7 ∼ 11 kg, and 6 ∼ 8 kg, respectively.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações na Gravidez / Magreza / Índice de Massa Corporal / Ganho de Peso na Gestação Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Assunto da revista: OBSTETRICIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações na Gravidez / Magreza / Índice de Massa Corporal / Ganho de Peso na Gestação Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Assunto da revista: OBSTETRICIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China