Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Ottawa clinical fear of recurrence instruments: A screener, self-report, and clinical interview.
Giguère, Lauriane; Mutsaers, Brittany; Harris, Cheryl; Smith, Allan 'Ben'; Humphris, Gerald M; Costa, Daniel; Kogan, Cary S; Simard, Sébastien; Lebel, Sophie.
Afiliação
  • Giguère L; School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Mutsaers B; School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Harris C; School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Smith A'; The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Cancer Therapeutics Program, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Humphris GM; The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Costa D; School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
  • Kogan CS; School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Simard S; School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Lebel S; Department of Health Sciences, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (UQAC), Saguenay, Québec, Canada.
Psychooncology ; 33(6): e6364, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38824493
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Clinical fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) was recently defined by a group of experts during a Delphi study. Five criteria were agreed upon, namely (a) high levels of preoccupation, (b) high levels of worry, (c) that are persistent, (d) hypervigilance and hypersensitivity to physical sensations that e) may result in functional impairment. No existing instruments comprehensively capture all these criteria for clinical FCR.

METHODS:

To remedy this gap, a set of three patient-reported outcome instruments including a one-item screener, self-report questionnaire, and semi-structured clinical interview, named the Ottawa Clinical Fear of Recurrence instruments, were developed. To do so, the research team first conducted a literature review of potential items. Additional FCR experts discussed the content of the screener and interview. The self-report's items were assessed for content validity by the same expert panel using Likert ratings and the Content Validity Index to narrow down the number of items. The three instruments were piloted with a group of cancer survivors to assess face validity following the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer recommendations.

RESULTS:

The literature review and content validity assessment led to a final draft pre-pilot of 23 potential items for the self-report questionnaire. The instruments were piloted. Pilot study participants suggested changing wording and response options (particularly for the self-report) for greater clarity.

CONCLUSIONS:

Based on the feedback received, minor modifications were made, mostly for the self-report. In general, content and face validity for the three instruments were good for both experts and cancer survivors.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medo / Autorrelato / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Psychooncology Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS / PSICOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medo / Autorrelato / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Psychooncology Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS / PSICOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá