Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Unilateral biportal endoscopic versus microscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a retrospective study.
Arunakul, Rattalerk; Anumas, Suthiya; Pattharanitima, Pattharawin; Susrivaraput, Chananyu; Pholsawatchai, Waroot.
Afiliação
  • Arunakul R; Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, 12120, Thailand.
  • Anumas S; Chulabhorn International College of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, 12120, Thailand.
  • Pattharanitima P; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, 12120, Thailand.
  • Susrivaraput C; Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, 12120, Thailand.
  • Pholsawatchai W; Chulabhorn International College of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, 12120, Thailand. warootmountaindew@gmail.com.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 19(1): 326, 2024 Jun 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38824551
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In the past decade, Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) with a microscopic tubular technique has become a surgical procedure that reduces surgical-related morbidity, shortens hospital stays, and expedites early rehabilitation in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases (LDD). Unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF) has emerged as a novel surgical technique. The present study aims to compare the clinical outcomes and postoperative complications of MIS-TLIF and Endo-TLIF for treating LDD.

METHODS:

A retrospective analysis of LLD patients undergoing either Endo-TLIF or MIS-TLIF was performed. Patient demographics, operative data (operation time, estimated blood loss, length of hospitalization), and complications were recorded. The visual analog scale (VAS) score for leg and back pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes.

RESULTS:

This study involved 80 patients, 56 in the MIS-TLIF group and 34 in the Endo-TLIF group. The Endo-TLIF group showed a more substantial improvement in the VAS for back pain at 3 weeks post-surgery compared to the MIS-TLIF group. However, at the 1-year mark after surgery, there were no significant differences between the groups in the mean VAS for back pain and VAS for leg pain. Interestingly, the ODI at one year demonstrated a significant improvement in the Endo-TLIF group compared to the MIS-TLIF group. Additionally, the MIS-TLIF group exhibited a shorter operative time than the Endo-TLIF group, with no notable differences in estimated blood loss, length of hospitalization, and complications between the two groups.

CONCLUSION:

Endo-TLIF and MIS-TLIF are both safe and effective for LDD. In surgical decision-making, clinicians may consider nuances revealed in this study, such as lower early postoperative back pain with Endo-TLIF and shorter operative time with MIS-TLIF.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fusão Vertebral / Endoscopia / Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral / Vértebras Lombares Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Orthop Surg Res Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Tailândia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fusão Vertebral / Endoscopia / Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral / Vértebras Lombares Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Orthop Surg Res Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Tailândia