Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
On the acceptance, commissioning, and quality assurance of electron FLASH units.
Palmiero, Allison; Liu, Kevin; Colnot, Julie; Chopra, Nitish; Neill, Denae; Connell, Luke; Velasquez, Brett; Koong, Albert C; Lin, Steven H; Balter, Peter; Tailor, Ramesh; Robert, Charlotte; Germond, Jean-François; Jorge, Patrik Gonçalves; Geyer, Reiner; Beddar, Sam; Moeckli, Raphael; Schüler, Emil.
Afiliação
  • Palmiero A; Department of Radiation Oncology, James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
  • Liu K; Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Colnot J; Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Chopra N; INSERM U1030, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
  • Neill D; Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Connell L; Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Velasquez B; Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Koong AC; Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Lin SH; Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Balter P; Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Tailor R; Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Robert C; Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Germond JF; Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Jorge PG; INSERM U1030, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
  • Geyer R; Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Rue du Grand-Pré-1, Lausanne CH-1007, Switzerland.
  • Beddar S; Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Rue du Grand-Pré-1, Lausanne CH-1007, Switzerland.
  • Moeckli R; Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Rue du Grand-Pré-1, Lausanne CH-1007, Switzerland.
  • Schüler E; Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
ArXiv ; 2024 May 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38827455
ABSTRACT
Background &

Purpose:

FLASH or ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) radiation therapy (RT) has gained attention in recent years for its ability to spare normal tissues relative to conventional dose rate (CDR) RT in various preclinical trials. However, clinical implementation of this promising treatment option has been limited because of the lack of availability of accelerators capable of delivering UHDR RT. Commercial options are finally reaching the market that produce electron beams with average dose rates of up to 1000 Gy/s. We established a framework for the acceptance, commissioning, and periodic quality assurance (QA) of electron FLASH units and present an example of commissioning.

Methods:

A protocol for acceptance, commissioning, and QA of UHDR linear accelerators was established by combining and adapting standards and professional recommendations for standard linear accelerators based on the experience with UHDR at four clinical centers that use different UHDR devices. Non-standard dosimetric beam parameters considered included pulse width, pulse repetition frequency, dose per pulse, and instantaneous dose rate, together with recommendations on how to acquire these measurements.

Results:

The 6- and 9-MeV beams of an UHDR electron device were commissioned by using this developed protocol. Measurements were acquired with a combination of ion chambers, beam current transformers (BCTs), and dose-rate-independent passive dosimeters. The unit was calibrated according to the concept of redundant dosimetry using a reference setup.

Conclusions:

This study provides detailed recommendations for the acceptance testing, commissioning, and routine QA of low-energy electron UHDR linear accelerators. The proposed framework is not limited to any specific unit, making it applicable to all existing eFLASH units in the market. Through practical insights and theoretical discourse, this document establishes a benchmark for the commissioning of UHDR devices for clinical use.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: ArXiv Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: ArXiv Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos