Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
International Consensus on Standard Outcome Measures for Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Consensus Statement.
Mulraney, Melissa; de Silva, Umanga; Joseph, Andria; Sousa Fialho, Maria da Luz; Dutia, Iain; Munro, Natalie; Payne, Jonathan M; Banaschewski, Tobias; de Lima, Cláudia Bandeira; Bellgrove, Mark A; Chamberlain, Samuel R; Chan, Phyllis; Chong, Ivy; Clink, Alison; Cortese, Samuele; Daly, Eileen; Faraone, Stephen V; Gladstone, Melissa; Guastella, Adam J; Järvdike, Juulia; Kaleem, Sidra; Lovell, Mark G; Meller, Tamasin; Nagy, Peter; Newcorn, Jeffrey H; Polanczyk, Guilherme V; Simonoff, Emily; Szatmari, Peter; Tehan, Caroline; Walsh, Karin; Wamithi, Susan; Coghill, David.
Afiliação
  • Mulraney M; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
  • de Silva U; International Consortium of Health Outcome Measures, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Joseph A; International Consortium of Health Outcome Measures, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Sousa Fialho MDL; International Consortium of Health Outcome Measures, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Dutia I; School of Allied Health, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Munro N; School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Payne JM; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Banaschewski T; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
  • de Lima CB; Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Bellgrove MA; Institute for Evidence Based Healthcare at University of Lisbon School and Medicine, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Chamberlain SR; Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health and School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Chan P; Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Chong I; Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, Norton College of Medicine at SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.
  • Clink A; Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Cortese S; May Institute Inc, Randolph, Massachusetts.
  • Daly E; Dundee & Angus ADHD Support Group, Dundee, UK.
  • Faraone SV; Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Gladstone M; Tees, Esk, and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.
  • Guastella AJ; Hassenfeld Children's Hospital at NYU Langone, New York University Child Study Center, New York City, New York.
  • Järvdike J; Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Studies of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
  • Kaleem S; Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Lovell MG; Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, Norton College of Medicine at SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.
  • Meller T; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Norton College of Medicine at SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.
  • Nagy P; Department of Women and Children's Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
  • Newcorn JH; Brain and Mind Centre, Children's Hospital Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Polanczyk GV; WeMind Suomi, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Simonoff E; Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Szatmari P; Tees, Esk, and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.
  • Tehan C; Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK.
  • Walsh K; Northern Beaches Child and Family Health Service, Sydney, Australia.
  • Wamithi S; Division of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Bethesda Children's Hospital, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Coghill D; Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(6): e2416760, 2024 Jun 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38869906
ABSTRACT
Importance The use of evidence-based standardized outcome measures is increasingly recognized as key to guiding clinical decision-making in mental health. Implementation of these measures into clinical practice has been hampered by lack of clarity on what to measure and how to do this in a reliable and standardized way.

Objective:

To develop a core set of outcome measures for specific neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), communication disorders, specific learning disorders, and motor disorders, that may be used across a range of geographic and cultural settings. Evidence Review An international working group composed of clinical and research experts and service users (n = 27) was convened to develop a standard core set of accessible, valid, and reliable outcome measures for children and adolescents with NDDs. The working group participated in 9 video conference calls and 8 surveys between March 1, 2021, and June 30, 2022. A modified Delphi approach defined the scope, outcomes, included measures, case-mix variables, and measurement time points. After development, the NDD set was distributed to professionals and service users for open review, feedback, and external validation.

Findings:

The final set recommends measuring 12 outcomes across 3 key domains (1) core symptoms related to the diagnosis; (2) impact, functioning, and quality of life; and (3) common coexisting problems. The following 14 measures should be administered at least every 6 months to monitor these

outcomes:

ADHD Rating Scale 5, Vanderbilt ADHD Diagnostic Rating Scale, or Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Rating Scale IV; Affective Reactivity Index; Children's Communication Checklist 2; Colorado Learning Disabilities Questionnaire; Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire; Developmental-Disability Children's Global Assessment Scale; Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire; Family Strain Index; Intelligibility in Context Scale; Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale or Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised and Social Responsiveness Scale; Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scales; and Yale Global Tic Severity Scale. The external review survey was completed by 32 professionals and 40 service users. The NDD set items were endorsed by more than 70% of professionals and service users in the open review survey. Conclusions and Relevance The NDD set covers outcomes of most concern to patients and caregivers. Use of the NDD set has the potential to improve clinical practice and research.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde / Consenso / Transtornos do Neurodesenvolvimento Limite: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: JAMA Netw Open Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde / Consenso / Transtornos do Neurodesenvolvimento Limite: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: JAMA Netw Open Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália