Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Triple Jeopardy in Oral Health: Additive Effects of Immigrant Status, Education, and Neighborhood.
Soares, G H; Haag, D; Bastos, J L; Mejia, G; Jamieson, L.
Afiliação
  • Soares GH; Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, Adelaide Dental School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
  • Haag D; Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, Adelaide Dental School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
  • Bastos JL; Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
  • Mejia G; Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, Adelaide Dental School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
  • Jamieson L; Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, Adelaide Dental School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
JDR Clin Trans Res ; : 23800844241253518, 2024 Jun 14.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38877725
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To estimate the additive effects of parent's nativity status/language spoken at country of birth, education, and area-level socioeconomic status (SES) on untreated dental caries among children aged 5 to 9 y in Australia.

METHODS:

Cross-sectional population-based data were obtained from the 2014 National Child Oral Health Study (N = 12,140). Indicators of social position used to explore additive effects on dental caries included nativity status, language, university degree, and neighborhood socioeconomic level. Multiple-way interactions were examined, and departure from additivity resulting from 2- and 3-way interactions were estimated as relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI).

RESULTS:

Children marginalized across multiple layers of disadvantage had substantially higher frequencies of dental caries compared with children in the most advantaged category. RERI for the 3-way interaction between immigrant status, education, and neighborhood SES was negative (RERI3 -0.14; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.68, 1.40). When operationalizing language, education, and neighborhood SES, the joint effect of the 3 marginalized positions was additive (RERI3 0.43; 95% CI -2.08, 2.95).

CONCLUSION:

Children marginalized across multiple intersecting axes of disadvantage bear the greatest burden of dental caries, with frequencies surpassing the cumulative effect of each social position alone. Findings emphasize the need to account for intersecting inequities and their oral health effects among children with immigrant backgrounds. KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT Our analysis underscores the necessity for policies and public health strategies targeting dental caries-related inequities to comprehensively account for various indicators of social disadvantage, particularly encompassing language proficiency, educational attainment, and neighborhood socioeconomic status. Within the intricate interplay of these factors, we identify a vulnerable subgroup comprising children with the highest prevalence of dental decay. Therefore, prioritizing this specific demographic should be the focal point of policies and public health initiatives aimed at fostering equitable oral health outcomes.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: JDR Clin Trans Res Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: JDR Clin Trans Res Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália