Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Virtual reconstruction of orbital defects using Gaussian process morphable models.
Vanslambrouck, Pieter; Van Dessel, Jeroen; Politis, Constantinus; Willaert, Robin; Bila, Michel; Sun, Yi; Claes, Peter.
Afiliação
  • Vanslambrouck P; Department of Computer Science, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. vanslambrouck.pieter@gmail.com.
  • Van Dessel J; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. vanslambrouck.pieter@gmail.com.
  • Politis C; OMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. vanslambrouck.pieter@gmail.com.
  • Willaert R; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. jeroen.vandessel@kuleuven.be.
  • Bila M; OMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. jeroen.vandessel@kuleuven.be.
  • Sun Y; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Claes P; OMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38896405
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The conventional method to reconstruct the bone level for orbital defects, which is based on mirroring and manual adaptation, is time-consuming and the accuracy highly depends on the expertise of the clinical engineer. The aim of this study is to propose and evaluate an automated reconstruction method utilizing a Gaussian process morphable model (GPMM).

METHODS:

Sixty-five Computed Tomography (CT) scans of healthy midfaces were used to create a GPMM that can model shape variations of the orbital region. Parameter optimization was performed by evaluating several quantitative metrics inspired on the shape modeling literature, e.g. generalization and specificity. The reconstruction error was estimated by reconstructing artificial defects created in orbits from fifteen CT scans that were not included in the GPMM. The developed algorithms utilize the existing framework of Gaussian process morphable models, as implemented in the Scalismo software.

RESULTS:

By evaluating the proposed quality metrics, adequate parameters are chosen for non-rigid registration and reconstruction. The resulting median reconstruction error using the GPMM was lower (0.35 ± 0.16 mm) compared to the mirroring method (0.52 ± 0.18 mm). In addition, the GPMM-based reconstruction is automated and can be applied to large bilateral defects with a median reconstruction error of 0.39 ± 0.11 mm.

CONCLUSION:

The GPMM-based reconstruction proves to be less time-consuming and more accurate than reconstruction by mirroring. Further validation through clinical studies on patients with orbital defects is warranted. Nevertheless, the results underscore the potential of GPMM-based reconstruction as a promising alternative for designing patient-specific implants.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Assunto da revista: RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Assunto da revista: RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica