Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Why is a small sample size not enough?
Cao, Ying; Chen, Ronald C; Katz, Aaron J.
Afiliação
  • Cao Y; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
  • Chen RC; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
  • Katz AJ; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Oncologist ; 2024 Jun 27.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38934301
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Clinical studies are often limited by resources available, which results in constraints on sample size. We use simulated data to illustrate study implications when the sample size is too small. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

Using 2 theoretical populations each with N = 1000, we randomly sample 10 from each population and conduct a statistical comparison, to help make a conclusion about whether the 2 populations are different. This exercise is repeated for a total of 4 studies 2 concluded that the 2 populations are statistically significantly different, while 2 showed no statistically significant difference.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our simulated examples demonstrate that sample sizes play important roles in clinical research. The results and conclusions, in terms of estimates of means, medians, Pearson correlations, chi-square test, and P values, are unreliable with small samples.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Oncologist Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Oncologist Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos