Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical application of biomaterials in orbital implants: a systematic review.
Sadeghi, Saeideh; Pezeshgi, Saharnaz; Sadeghi, Reza; Bayan, Nikoo; Farrokhpour, Hossein; Amanollahi, Mobina; Bereimipour, Ahmad; Abolghasemi Mahani, Amin.
Afiliação
  • Sadeghi S; Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
  • Pezeshgi S; School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Sadeghi R; School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Bayan N; School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Farrokhpour H; Students' Scientific Research Center (SSRC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Amanollahi M; School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Bereimipour A; School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Abolghasemi Mahani A; Department of Biological Science and BioDiscovery Institute, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA.
Int Ophthalmol ; 44(1): 290, 2024 Jun 27.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38937319
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Various materials have been proposed for reconstructing orbital fractures. The materials used must meet certain criteria to ensure their suitability for restoring the structure and function of the organ. These criteria include biocompatibility, ease of application, non-toxicity, hypo-allergenicity, and non-carcinogenicity. In this study, we systematically reviewed the studies regarding the biomaterials in orbital implants and their clinical application.

METHODS:

A comprehensive search across various databases, including PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, was conducted until April 10th, 2023. After retrieving the search results and eliminating duplicates, final studies were included after screening through defined criteria. Human and animal studies assessing the clinical application of biomaterials in orbital implants were included. The quality of the case series and controlled intervention studies were evaluated using the NIH tool, and for animal studies, the risk of bias was assessed using SYRCLE's tool.

RESULTS:

Seventeen studies were included according to defined criteria. These studies aimed to explore the clinical application of biomaterials and examine the associated complications in orbital implants.

CONCLUSION:

We found that using biomaterials did not result in elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). However, we did observe certain complications, with infection, residual diplopia, and enophthalmos being the most frequently reported issues.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fraturas Orbitárias / Materiais Biocompatíveis / Implantes Orbitários Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int Ophthalmol / Int. ophthalmol / International ophthalmology Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Irã

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fraturas Orbitárias / Materiais Biocompatíveis / Implantes Orbitários Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int Ophthalmol / Int. ophthalmol / International ophthalmology Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Irã