Ocular syphilis in patients with nonreactive RPR and positive treponemal serologies: a retrospective observational cohort study.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Screening for syphilis increasingly relies on positive treponemal rather than nontreponemal tests (rapid plasma reagin [RPR]). We compared ocular syphilis in patients with nonreactive versus positive RPR. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of ocular syphilis treated at two New England hospitals 1996-2021 based on ophthalmologist-diagnosed eye findings and positive treponemal serology, regardless of RPR. We excluded patients with alternative diagnoses. We categorized RPR into nonreactive RPR, low-titer RPR (<18), and high-titer RPR (≥18) and compared early and long-term response to therapy. RESULTS: Our sample included 115 patients with ocular syphilis (median follow-up 2.5 years) 25 (22%) nonreactive RPR, 21 (18%) low-titer RPR, 69 (60%) high-titer RPR. Compared with nonreactive and low-titer RPR, people with high-titer RPR were younger (mean 47 years, p<0.001), more likely male (93%, p<0.001) and more likely to be living with HIV (49%, p<0.001). People with nonreactive and low-titer RPR were less likely than high-titer RPR to have posterior/panuveitis (32% and 29% versus 75%, p<0.001) or abnormal CSF (26% and 35% versus 75%, p<0.001), and more likely to present with chronic eye findings (20% and 29% versus 1%, p<0.001). In long-term follow up, eye findings improved and did not recur in most patients (62% nonreactive, 68% low-titer, 96% high-titer RPR); improved but recurred in 29%, 11%, and 4%, respectively; and were stable in 10%, 21%, and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients with ocular syphilis and nonreactive RPR are similar to patients with low-titer RPR, and antibiotic therapy is beneficial in most.