Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Head-to-head comparison of treatment sequences in advanced pancreatic cancer-Real-world data from the prospective German TPK clinical cohort study.
Marschner, Norbert; Haug, Nina; Hegewisch-Becker, Susanna; Reiser, Marcel; Dörfel, Steffen; Lerchenmüller, Christian; Linde, Hartmut; Wolf, Thomas; Hof, Anna; Kaiser-Osterhues, Anja; Potthoff, Karin; Jänicke, Martina.
Afiliação
  • Marschner N; Med. Klinik 1, Universitätsklinik Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Haug N; iOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Hegewisch-Becker S; Biostatistics, iOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Reiser M; Hämatologisch-Onkologische Praxis Eppendorf (HOPE), Hamburg, Germany.
  • Dörfel S; PIOH-Praxis Internistische Onkologie und Hämatologie, Köln, Germany.
  • Lerchenmüller C; Onkozentrum Dresden/Freiberg, Dresden, Germany.
  • Linde H; Hämatologisch-onkologische Gemeinschaftspraxis, Münster, Germany.
  • Wolf T; MVZ für Blut- und Krebserkrankungen, Potsdam, Germany.
  • Hof A; BAG, Gemeinschaftspraxis Hämatologie-Onkologie, Dresden, Germany.
  • Kaiser-Osterhues A; Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, iOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Potthoff K; Medical Department, iOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Jänicke M; Medical Department, iOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany.
Int J Cancer ; 2024 Jul 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38956837
ABSTRACT
There are no clear guidelines regarding the optimal treatment sequence for advanced pancreatic cancer, as head-to-head phase III randomised trials are missing. We assess real-world effectiveness of three common sequential treatment strategies by emulating a hypothetical randomised trial. This analysis included 1551 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer from the prospective, clinical cohort study Tumour Registry Pancreatic Cancer receiving FOLFIRINOX (n = 613) or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GEMNAB; n = 938) as palliative first-line treatment. We used marginal structural modelling to compare overall survival (OS) and time to deterioration (TTD) of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between three common first- to second-line treatment sequences, adjusting for time-varying potential confounding. The sequences were FOLFIRINOX→GEMNAB, GEMNAB→FOLFOX/OFF and GEMNAB→nanoliposomal irinotecan (NALIRI) + 5-fluorouracil. Outcome was also calculated stratified by patients' prognostic risk according to the Pancreatic Cancer Score. Median OS and TTD of HRQoL independent of risk were 10.7 [8.9, 11.9] and 6.4 [4.8, 7.7] months for FOLFIRINOX→GEMNAB, 8.4 [7.4, 9.7] and 5.8 [4.6, 7.1] months for GEMNAB→FOLFOX/OFF and 8.9 [7.8, 10.4] and 4.6 [4.1, 6.1] months for GEMNAB→NALIRI+5-fluorouracil. Compared to FOLFIRINOX→GEMNAB, OS and TTD were worse for poor-risk patients with GEMNAB→FOLFOX/OFF (OS HR 2.09 [1.47, 2.98]; TTD HR 1.97 [1.19, 3.27]) and those with GEMNAB→NALIRI+5-fluorouracil (OS HR 1.35, [0.76, 2.39]; TTD HR 2.62 [1.56, 4.42]). Brackets denote 95%-confidence intervals. The estimated real-world effectiveness of the three treatment sequences evaluated were largely comparable. Poor-risk patients might benefit from intensified treatment with FOLFIRINOX→GEMNAB in terms of clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Future randomised trials on sequential treatments in advanced pancreatic cancer are warranted.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Int J Cancer Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Int J Cancer Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha