Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Selection of Single-Analyte Delta Check Rules with Logistic Regression for Detection of Intravenous Fluid Contamination in a Clinical Chemistry Laboratory.
Yang, Jianbo; Wen, Sijin; McCudden, Christopher R; Tacker, Danyel H.
Afiliação
  • Yang J; Department of Pathology, Anatomy and Laboratory Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States.
  • Wen S; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States.
  • McCudden CR; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
  • Tacker DH; Department of Pathology, Anatomy and Laboratory Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States.
J Appl Lab Med ; 2024 Jul 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38959067
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The conventional single-analyte delta check, utilized for identifying intravenous fluid contamination and other preanalytical errors, is known to flag many specimens reflecting true patient status changes. This study aimed to derive delta check rules that more accurately identify contamination.

METHODS:

Results for calcium, creatinine, glucose, sodium, and potassium were retrieved from 326 103 basic or comprehensive metabolic panels tested between February 2021 and January 2022. In total, 7934 specimens showed substantial result changes, of which 1489 were labeled as either contaminated or non-contaminated based on chart review. These labeled specimens were used to derive logistic regression models and to select the most predictive single-analyte delta checks for 4 common contaminants. Their collective performance was evaluated using a test data set from October 2023 comprising 14 717 specimens.

RESULTS:

The most predictive single-analyte delta checks included a calcium change by ≤-24% for both saline and Plasma-Lyte A contamination, a potassium increase by ≥3.0 mmol/L for potassium contamination, and a glucose increase by ≥400 mg/dL (22.2 mmol/L) for dextrose contamination. In the training data sets, multi-analyte logistic regression models performed better than single-analyte delta checks. In the test data set, logistic regression models and single-analyte delta checks demonstrated collective alert rates of 0.58% (95% CI, 0.46%-0.71%) and 0.60% (95% CI, 0.49%-0.74%), respectively, along with collective positive predictive values of 79% (95% CI, 70%-89%) and 77% (95% CI, 68%-87%).

CONCLUSIONS:

Single-analyte delta checks selected by logistic regression demonstrated a low false alert rate.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Appl Lab Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Appl Lab Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos