Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Psychosocial distress and psychosocial resources in couples facing non-melanoma skin cancers and malignant melanoma.
Sauer, Christina; Ullerich, Cathrin; Livingstone, Elisabeth; Tagay, Sefik; Bugaj, Till J; Skoda, Eva-Maria; Teufel, Martin; Schadendorf, Dirk; Friederich, Hans-Christoph.
Afiliação
  • Sauer C; Clinic of General Internal and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Ullerich C; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Livingstone E; Clinic of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Berlin-Bernau, Germany.
  • Tagay S; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
  • Bugaj TJ; Institute for Gender Studies, University of Technology, Arts and Sciences Köln, Köln, Germany.
  • Skoda EM; Clinic of General Internal and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Teufel M; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Schadendorf D; Clinic of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
  • Friederich HC; Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
J Psychosoc Oncol ; : 1-16, 2024 Jul 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38959518
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Skin cancer is the most common cancer worldwide and comprises various non-melanoma skin cancer (NMCS) diagnoses and malignant melanoma (MM). It places a psychological burden on patients and their spouses. The present study aims to investigate psychological distress, temporal changes of psychosocial resources (PR), as well as dyadic dynamics of psychological distress and PR in patients with NMSC or MM and their spouses.

METHODS:

Fifty-four heterosexual couples with different skin cancers, diagnosed within the previous 12 months, participated in this quantitative cross-sectional study. Patients and spouses provided information about depression and anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), PR within the last four weeks and last three years (Essen Resource Inventory), and partnership quality (Partnership Questionnaire, short version). Dyadic dynamics were analyzed with multiple regression analyses.

RESULTS:

We found similar distress levels in patients and spouses, as well as in patients with different skin cancers. Spouses from patients with MM reported significant higher distress levels than spouses from patient with NMSC. Patients' depression predicted spouses' depression, and spouses' anxiety predicted patients' anxiety. In patients, we found associations between personal resources (within the last four weeks and three years) and depression, and an association between patients' social resources (within the last three years) and spouses' depression.

CONCLUSIONS:

The psychological interdependencies between patients' and spouses' depression and anxiety highlight the importance of considering psychological distress in patients with different skin cancers from a dyadic perspective in clinical contexts. Further, personal resources were indicated as a "distress buffer" for patients' mental health. Our results underline the importance of couple interventions that activate PR in patients with cancer and their spouses.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Psychosoc Oncol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Psychosoc Oncol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha