Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Oncological outcomes after laparotomic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted laparoscopic staging for early-stage high-intermediate or high-risk endometrial cancer.
Koek, Ruben C G; Wenzel, Hans; Jonges, Geertruida N; Lok, Christianne A R; Zweemer, Ronald; Gerestein, Cornelis G.
Afiliação
  • Koek RCG; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Wenzel H; Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Jonges GN; Department of Pathology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Lok CAR; Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands.
  • Zweemer R; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Gerestein CG; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands c.g.gerestein-2@umcutrecht.nl.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 2024 Jul 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39019491
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To compare oncological outcomes in patients with early-stage high-intermediate or high-risk endometrial cancer undergoing surgical staging by laparotomy, conventional laparoscopy, or robot-assisted laparoscopy.

METHODS:

Patients diagnosed between 2015 and 2021 with stage I-II (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009), high-intermediate or high-risk endometrial cancer who underwent staging surgery, were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Five-year disease-free survival and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between groups were evaluated using log-rank testing. Additionally, survival analyses were stratified by histological subtype. The effect of surgical modality on risk of recurrence and all-cause death was assessed by performing Cox regression analysis with inverse probability treatment weighting.

RESULTS:

In total 941 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 399 (42.4%) underwent staging surgery by laparotomy, 273 (29.0%) by laparoscopy, and 269 (28.6%) by robot-assisted laparoscopy. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the three groups. No difference in disease-free survival (75.0% vs 71.2% vs 79.0% p=0.35) or overall survival (72.7% vs 72.3% vs 71.2% p=0.98) was observed between patients after laparotomy, laparoscopy, or robot-assisted laparoscopy, respectively. Subanalyses based on histological subtype showed comparable disease-free survival and overall survival between surgical approaches. After correcting for possible confounders by means of inverse probability treatment weighting, there was no significantly increased risk of recurrence or risk of all-cause death after laparoscopy or robot-assisted laparoscopy.

CONCLUSION:

Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic staging surgery in women with early-stage high-intermediate or high-risk endometrial cancer are safe alternatives to laparotomic staging surgery.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Int J Gynecol Cancer Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Int J Gynecol Cancer Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda