Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Objective performance indicators during specific steps of robotic right colectomy can differentiate surgeon expertise.
Gillani, Mishal; Rupji, Manali; Paul Olson, Terrah Jean; Balch, Glen C; Shields, Mallory C; Liu, Yuan; Rosen, Seth Alan.
Afiliação
  • Gillani M; Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
  • Rupji M; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
  • Paul Olson TJ; Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
  • Balch GC; Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
  • Shields MC; Research Division, Intuitive Surgical, Norcross, GA.
  • Liu Y; Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
  • Rosen SA; Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA. Electronic address: seth.rosen@emoryhealthcare.org.
Surgery ; 2024 Jul 17.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39025692
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Current surgical assessment tools are subjective and nonscalable. Objective performance indicators, calculated from robotic systems data, provide automated data regarding surgeon movements and robotic arm kinematics. We identified objective performance indicators that significantly differed among expert and trainee surgeons during specific steps of robotic right colectomy.

METHODS:

Endoscopic videos were annotated to delineate surgical steps during robotic right colectomies. Objective performance indicators were compared during mesenteric dissection, ascending colon mobilization, hepatic flexure mobilization, and bowel preparation for transection.

RESULTS:

Twenty-five robotic right colectomy procedures (461 total surgical steps) performed by 2 experts and 8 trainees were analyzed. Experts exhibited faster camera acceleration and jerk during all steps, as well as faster dominant and nondominant arm acceleration and dominant arm jerk during all steps except distal bowel preparation. During mesenteric dissection, experts used faster camera and dominant arm velocity. During medial-to-lateral ascending colon mobilization, experts used less-dominant wrist yaw and pitch, faster nondominant arm velocity, shorter dominant arm path length, and shorter moving times for camera, dominant arm, and nondominant arm. During lateral-to-medial ascending colon mobilization, experts had faster dominant and nondominant arm velocity and third-arm acceleration. During hepatic flexure mobilization, experts exhibited more camera movements, greater velocity for camera, dominant and nondominant arms, and faster third-arm acceleration. During distal bowel preparation, experts used greater dominant wrist articulation, faster camera velocity, and longer nondominant arm path length. During proximal bowel preparation, experts demonstrated faster nondominant arm velocity.

CONCLUSION:

Objective performance indicators can differentiate experts from trainees during distinct steps of robotic right colectomy. These automated, objective and scalable metrics can provide personalized feedback for trainees.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Surgery Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Gabão

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Surgery Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Gabão