Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Restrictive versus Decision Support Guided Fluid Therapy During Major Hepatic Resection Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Coeckelenbergh, Sean; Proux-Soucy, Maxim; Van der Linden, Philippe; Roullet, Stephanie; Moussa, Maya; Kato, Hiromi; Toubal, Leila; Naili, Salima; Rinehart, Joseph; Grogan, Tristan; Cannesson, Maxime; Duranteau, Jacques; Joosten, Alexandre.
Afiliação
  • Coeckelenbergh S; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Villejuif, France.
  • Proux-Soucy M; Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Van der Linden P; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Villejuif, France.
  • Roullet S; Department of Anesthesiology, Montreal University Hospital, Montreal, Canada.
  • Moussa M; Consultant Anesthesiologist, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Kato H; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Villejuif, France.
  • Toubal L; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Villejuif, France.
  • Naili S; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Villejuif, France.
  • Rinehart J; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Villejuif, France.
  • Grogan T; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Villejuif, France.
  • Cannesson M; Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Care, University of California Irvine, California, USA.
  • Duranteau J; Department of Medicine Statistics Core, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Joosten A; Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, California, USA.
Anesthesiology ; 2024 Jul 25.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39052844
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Fluid therapy during major hepatic resection aims at minimizing fluids during the dissection phase to reduce central venous pressure (CVP), retrograde liver blood flow, and venous bleeding. This strategy, however, may lead to hyperlactatemia. The Acumen™ Assisted Fluid Management system uses novel decision support software whose algorithm helps clinicians optimize fluid therapy. We tested the hypothesis that using this decision support system could decrease arterial lactate at the end of major hepatic resection when compared to a more restrictive fluid strategy.

METHODS:

This two-arm, prospective, randomized controlled, assessor-and patient-blinded superiority study included consecutive patients undergoing major liver surgery equipped with an arterial catheter linked to an uncalibrated stroke volume monitor. In the decision support group, fluid therapy was guided throughout the entire procedure using the assisted fluid management software. In the restrictive fluid group, clinicians were recommended to restrict fluid infusion to 1-2 ml.kg-1.h-1 until the completion of hepatectomy. They then administered fluids based on advanced hemodynamic variables. Noradrenaline was titrated in all patients to maintain a mean arterial pressure >65mmHg. The primary outcome was arterial lactate level upon completion of surgery (i.e., skin closure).

RESULTS:

Ninety patients were enrolled over a 7-month period. The primary outcome was lower in the decision support group than in the restrictive group (median[Q1-Q3] 2.5[1.9-3.7]mmol.L-1 vs 4.6[3.1-5.4]mmol.L-1, median difference -2.1, 95%CI(-2.7,-1.2), p<0.001). Among secondary exploratory outcomes, there was no difference in blood loss (median[Q1-Q3] 450[300-600]ml vs 500[300-800]ml, p=0.727) although CVP was higher in the decision support group (mean (SD) of 7.7(2.0)mmHg vs 6.6(1.1)mmHg, p<0.002).

CONCLUSION:

Patients managed using a clinical decision support system to guide fluid administration during major hepatic resection had a lower arterial lactate concentration at the end of surgery when compared to a more restrictive fluid strategy. Future trials are necessary to make conclusive recommendations that will change clinical practice.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Anesthesiology Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Anesthesiology Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França