Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Perioperative Safety of Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Coronary Bypass in Elderly.
Chaban, Ryan; Ghazy, Ahmed; Treede, Hendrik.
Afiliação
  • Chaban R; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Johannes Gutenberg University, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
  • Ghazy A; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Johannes Gutenberg University, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
  • Treede H; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Johannes Gutenberg University, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Rev Cardiovasc Med ; 24(1): 4, 2023 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39076871
ABSTRACT

Background:

The benefits of utilizing internal thoracic arteries (ITAs) in coronary bypass surgery are well-known. However, the safety of this practice in elderly patients needs to be proven.

Methods:

We studied all patients who are 75 years of age and older, who received at least one ITA graft while undergoing isolated, conventional (median sternotomy) coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) between Jan 1st 2002 and Dec 31st 2020 (19 years). Emergent surgeries were excluded. Propensity score matching was used to reduce the patient selection effect. Study outcomes were 30-days mortality, and two sets of dependent intraoperative parameters and postoperative parameters.

Results:

A total of 1855 patients undergoing CABG was included, of which 1114 received a single left (s)ITA and 741 received combined left and right (d)ITA grafts. 519 pairs were matched. The decision for sITA or dITA was made individually. Thirty-days mortality was low and similar in both groups (sITA 3.3%; dITA 2.9%, p = 0.859). The incidence of sternal wound healing disorder was higher after dITA (3.3 vs 6.9%; p < 0.011), which had also a longer skin-to-skin operative time (181 vs 205 min; p < 0.0001). Re-thoracotomy rates were similar (4.6 vs 6.2%; p = 0.340). There were no significant differences in other secondary parameters.

Conclusions:

harvesting both ITAs in elderly patients is safe and feasible. However, it increases the risk of sternal wound healing disorders. Long term benefit still needs to be proven.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Rev Cardiovasc Med Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Rev Cardiovasc Med Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha