Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Overall side effect assessment of oxaliplatin toxicity in rectal cancer patients in NRG oncology/NSABP R04.
Peipert, John Devin; Roydhouse, Jessica; Tighiouart, Mourad; Henry, Norah Lynn; Kim, Sungjin; Hays, Ron D; Rogatko, Andre; Yothers, Greg; Ganz, Patricia A.
Afiliação
  • Peipert JD; Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 625 Michigan Ave, 22nd Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. john.peipert@northwestern.edu.
  • Roydhouse J; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
  • Tighiouart M; Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Henry NL; University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Kim S; Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Hays RD; Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Rogatko A; Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Yothers G; University of Pittsburgh and NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Ganz PA; Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Qual Life Res ; 2024 Jul 30.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39080091
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Regulatory guidance suggests capturing patient-reported overall side effect impact in cancer trials. We examined whether the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) GP5 item ("I am bothered by side effects of treatment") post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy/radiotherapy differed between oxaliplatin vs. non- oxaliplatin arms in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) R-04 trial of stage II-III rectal cancer patients.

METHODS:

The R-04 neoadjuvant trial compared local-regional tumor control between patients randomized to receive 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine with radiation, with or without oxaliplatin (4 treatment arms). Participants completed surveys at baseline and immediately after chemoradiotherapy. GP5 has a 5-point response scale "Not at all" (0), "A little bit" (1), "Somewhat" (2), "Quite a bit" (3), and "Very much" (4). Logistic regression compared the odds of reporting moderate-high side effect impact (GP5 2-4) between patients receiving oxaliplatin or not after chemoradiotherapy, controlling for relevant patient characteristics. We examined associations between GP5 and other patient-reported outcomes reflecting side effects.

RESULTS:

Analyses were performed among 1132 study participants. Participants receiving oxaliplatin were 1.58 times (95% CI 1.22-2.05) more likely to report moderate-high side effect bother at post-chemotherapy/radiation. In both arms, worse overall side effect impact was associated with patient-reported diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and peripheral sensory neuropathy (p < 0.01 for all).

CONCLUSION:

This secondary analysis of R-04 found that GP5 distinguished between patients receiving oxaliplatin or not as part of their post-neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, adding patient-centric evidence on the reduced tolerability of oxaliplatin and demonstrating that GP5 is sensitive to known toxicity differences between treatments. CLINICALTRIALS GOV NCT00058474.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Qual Life Res Assunto da revista: REABILITACAO / TERAPEUTICA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Qual Life Res Assunto da revista: REABILITACAO / TERAPEUTICA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos