Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Margin Width and Local Recurrence in Patients with Phyllodes Tumors of the Breast.
Del Calvo, Haydee; Wu, Yun; Lin, Heather Y; Nassif, Elise F; Zarzour, Maria A; Guadagnolo, B Ashleigh; Hunt, Kelly K; Bedrosian, Isabelle; Lillemoe, Heather A.
Afiliação
  • Del Calvo H; Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Wu Y; Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Lin HY; Department of Biostatistics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Nassif EF; Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Zarzour MA; Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Guadagnolo BA; Department of Sarcoma Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Hunt KK; Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Bedrosian I; Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Lillemoe HA; Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 2024 Jul 31.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39085546
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Optimal surgical margin width for patients with phyllodes tumors (PTs) of the breast remains debated. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of margin width on long-term local recurrence risk. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

This was a single-institution retrospective review of patients with confirmed PT treated from 2008-2015. Margins were defined as positive (ink on tumor), narrow (no tumor at inked margin but < 10mm), or widely free (>/= 10mm). LR rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS:

Among 117 female patients, histology included 55 (47%) benign, 29 (25%) borderline, and 33 (28%) malignant PT. Final margins were positive in 16 (14%), narrow in 32 (27%), widely free in 64 (55%), and unknown in 5 (4%) patients. Compared with margins > 10 mm, patients with positive and narrow margins had a higher LR risk [HR 10.57 (95% CI 2.48-45.02) and HR 5.66 (95% CI 1.19-26.99), respectively]. Among benign PTs, the 10-year LR-free rates were 100%, 94%, and 66% for widely negative, narrow, and positive margins, respectively (p = 0.056). For borderline/malignant PT, the 10-year LR-free rates were 93% and 57% for widely negative and narrow margins, respectively (p = 0.02), with no difference in LR between narrow and positive margin groups (p = 1.00).

CONCLUSIONS:

For benign PTs, a margin of no ink on tumor appears sufficient to optimize local control. In patients with borderline or malignant PTs, achieving a wide surgical margin may remain important as narrower margins were associated with LR rates comparable to those with positive margins.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos