Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
High Prevalence of Multistep Algorithms in Diagnostic Clostridioides difficile Laboratory Testing.
Sullivan, Kaede V; Souers, Rhona J; Hillesland, Erica; Pillai, Dylan; Rhoads, Daniel D; Rolf, Robin; Simner, Patricia J; Wojewoda, Christina M; Rauch, Carol A.
Afiliação
  • Sullivan KV; From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Sullivan).
  • Souers RJ; The Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Sullivan).
  • Hillesland E; Laboratory Improvement Programs, Proficiency Testing Department, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois (Souers, Hillesland, Rolf).
  • Pillai D; Laboratory Improvement Programs, Proficiency Testing Department, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois (Souers, Hillesland, Rolf).
  • Rhoads DD; The Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Precision Laboratories, Diagnostic & Scientific Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (Pillai).
  • Rolf R; The Department of Laboratory Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (Rhoads).
  • Simner PJ; The Department of Pathology, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western University, Cleveland, Ohio (Rhoads).
  • Wojewoda CM; The Infection Biology Program, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, Ohio (Rhoads).
  • Rauch CA; Laboratory Improvement Programs, Proficiency Testing Department, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois (Souers, Hillesland, Rolf).
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 2024 Aug 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39101237
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT.­ Laboratory testing practices for diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) have evolved in response to published guidelines, availability of highly sensitive nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs), perceived problems with the specificity of NAATs, and CDI reporting requirements. OBJECTIVE.­ To assess the current state of laboratory practice for diagnostic CDI testing. DESIGN.­ An optional 8-item supplemental questionnaire was distributed in December 2019 to the 1374 laboratories participating in the College of American Pathologists C difficile Detection (CDF) proficiency testing program challenge CDF-C. RESULTS.­ Of 1374 CDF-C participants, 1160 (84.4%) responded, predominantly representing laboratories based in the United States (1077 of 1160; 92.8%). The majority reported using a multistep testing algorithm (684 of 1159; 59.0%). Initial testing with a glutamate dehydrogenase and toxin A/B combination test followed by NAAT for discrepant results was the most common testing method (360 of 1146; 31.4%). NAAT alone (299 of 1146; 26.1%) was next, then NAAT followed by an assay that included toxin A/B enzyme immunoassay if NAAT is positive (258 of 1146; 22.5%). Only 5.4% (62 of 1146) reported using toxin A/B immunoassay alone. Most respondents (1093 of 1131; 96.6%) reported rejecting CDI tests on formed stool, but rejection of CDI testing in pediatric patients was uncommon (211 of 1131; 18.7%). Rejection of CDI testing in patients using laxatives was reported more often by US-based respondents (379 of 1054 [36.0%] versus 9 of 77 [11.7%], P < .001). CONCLUSIONS.­ Multistep algorithms for CDI diagnosis are widely used in line with published recommendations. Most respondents reported rejection of formed stool for CDI testing, but few reported rejection of testing in infants and patients taking laxatives, suggesting these may be areas of opportunity for laboratories to pursue in improving CDI testing practices.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Arch Pathol Lab Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Arch Pathol Lab Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article