Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Imbalanced specialty representation of USMLE and NBME test writers.
Mahoney, Mary T; Linkowski, Lauren C; Mix, Michael D; Wong, Roger; Sim, Austin J; Hoffe, Sarah E; Sura, Karna T.
Afiliação
  • Mahoney MT; Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, USA. marymahoneymd02@gmail.com.
  • Linkowski LC; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Mix MD; Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
  • Wong R; Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
  • Sim AJ; Department of Geriatrics, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
  • Hoffe SE; Department of Radiation Oncology, James Cancer Hospital, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Sura KT; Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
BMC Med Educ ; 24(1): 980, 2024 Sep 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39252083
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) is an examination series required for allopathic physician licensure in the United States (US). USMLE content is created and maintained by the National Board of Medical Examinations (NBME). The specialty composition of the USMLE and NBME taskforce members involved in the creation of examination content is currently unknown.

METHODS:

Using the 2021 USMLE and 2021 NBME Committees and Task Forces documents, we determined each member's board-certified primary specialty and involvement in test material development committees who we dubbed "test writers". Total active physicians by primary specialty were recorded from the 2020 Physician Specialty Data Report published by the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). Descriptive statistics and chi-square analysis were used to analyze the cohorts.

RESULTS:

The USMLE and NBME test writer primary specialty composition was found to be significantly different compared to the US active physician population (USMLE χ2[32] = 172, p < .001 and NBME χ2[32] = 200, p < .001). Only nineteen specialties were represented within USMLE test writers, with three specialties being proportionally represented. Two specialties were represented within NBME test writers. Obstetrics and Gynecology physicians were proportionally represented in USMLE but not within NBME test writers. Internal Medicine (IM) accounts for the largest percentage of all USMLE test writers (60/197, 30%) with an excess representation of 31 individuals.

CONCLUSIONS:

There is an imbalance in the specialty representation of USMLE and NBME test writers compared to the US active physician population. These findings may have implications for the unbiased and accurate portrayal of topics in such national examinations; thus, future investigation is warranted.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Avaliação Educacional / Licenciamento em Medicina Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Educ Assunto da revista: EDUCACAO Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Avaliação Educacional / Licenciamento em Medicina Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Educ Assunto da revista: EDUCACAO Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos