Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of somatostatin receptor imaging, computed tomography and ultrasound in the clinical management of neuroendocrine gastro-entero-pancreatic tumours.
Chiti, A; Fanti, S; Savelli, G; Romeo, A; Bellanova, B; Rodari, M; van Graafeiland, B J; Monetti, N; Bombardieri, E.
Afiliação
  • Chiti A; Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Milan, Italy.
Eur J Nucl Med ; 25(10): 1396-403, 1998 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9818279
ABSTRACT
Neuroendocrine tumours displaying somatostatin receptors have been successfully visualised with somatostatin receptor imaging (SRI). However, there may be differences in sensitivity depending on the site of the primary tumour and/or its metastases. We studied 131 patients affected by neuroendocrine tumours of the gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) tract. A pathological diagnosis was obtained in 116 patients, while in 15 the diagnosis was based on instrumental results and follow-up. Fifty-one patients were examined for staging purposes, 80 were in follow-up. Images were acquired 24 and 48 h after the injection of 150-220 MBq of indium-111 pentetreotide. Whole-body and SPET images were obtained in all patients. Patients were also studied with computed tomography (CT), ultrasound (US), and other procedures. Tumours were classified according to their site of origin pancreas n = 39, ileum n = 32, stomach n = 16, appendix n = 9, duodenum n = 5, jejunum n = 5, rectum n = 3, biliary tract n = 2, colon n = 2, caecum n = 1, liver metastases from unknown primary = 15, widespread metastases from unknown primary = 2. Sensitivity for primary tumour localisation was as follows SRI = 62%; CT = 43%; US = 36%; other procedures = 45%. Sensitivity for liver metastases SRI = 90%; CT = 78%; US = 88%; other procedures = 71%. Sensitivity for the detection of extrahepatic soft tissue lesions was SRI = 90%; CT = 66%; US = 47%; other procedures = 61%. Sensitivity for the detection of the primary tumour in patients with metastases from unknown primary sites SRI 4/17; CT 0/13; US 0/12; other procedures 1/10. In 28% of the patients SRI revealed previously unknown lesions, and in 21% it determined a modification of the scheduled therapy. Our study confirms the important role of SRI in the management of GEP tumours. However, we feel that a critical investigation should address its role in locating primary tumours, in particular in patients with metastases from unknown primary sites.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Receptores de Somatostatina / Tumores Neuroendócrinos / Neoplasias Gastrointestinais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Nucl Med Ano de publicação: 1998 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Receptores de Somatostatina / Tumores Neuroendócrinos / Neoplasias Gastrointestinais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Nucl Med Ano de publicação: 1998 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália