Comunicación Científica en Salud

1.

Peer support interventions for breast cancer patients: a systematic review.

Hu, Jieman; Wang, Xue; Guo, Shaoning; Chen, Fangfang; Wu, Yuan-Yu; Ji, Fu-Jian; Fang, Xuedong

Artículo [ PMID: 30600413 ] Idioma(s): Inglés

2.

Laughter and the Chair: Social Pressures Influencing Scoring During Grant Peer Review Meetings.

Pier, Elizabeth L; Raclaw, Joshua; Carnes, Molly; Ford, Cecilia E; Kaatz, Anna

Artículo [ PMID: 30604119 ] Idioma(s): Inglés

3.

Impact of Peer Review on Use of Hypofractionated Regimens for Early-Stage Breast Cancer for Patients at a Tertiary Care Academic Medical Center and Its Community-Based Affiliates.

Ganju, Rohit G; TenNapel, Mindi; Chen, Allen M; Mitchell, Melissa

Artículo [ PMID: 30625021 ] Idioma(s): Inglés

4.

Science peer review for the 21st century: Assessing scientific consensus for decision-making while managing conflict of interests, reviewer and process bias.

Kirman, C R; Simon, T W; Hays, S M

Artículo [ PMID: 30634024 ] Idioma(s): Inglés

5.

Toxicologic Pathology Forum*: Opinion on Considerations for the Use of Whole Slide Images in GLP Pathology Peer Review.

Bradley, Alys; Jacobsen, Matt

Artículo [ PMID: 30636543 ] Idioma(s): Inglés

6.

Fake Peer Review and Inappropriate Authorship Are Real Evils.

Rivera, Horacio

Artículo [ PMID: 30636943 ] Idioma(s): Inglés

7.

Predatory Journals Undermine Peer Review and Cheapen Scholarship.

Butterworth, John F; Vetter, Thomas R

Artículo [ PMID: 30550469 ] Idioma(s): Inglés

8.

Peer support opportunities across the cancer care continuum: a systematic scoping review of recent peer-reviewed literature.

Kowitt, Sarah D; Ellis, Katrina R; Carlisle, Veronica; Bhushan, Nivedita L; Black, Kristin Z; Brodar, Kaitlyn; Cranley, Nicole M; Davis, Kia L; Eng, Eugenia; Martin, Michelle Y; McGuirt, Jared; Sokol, Rebeccah L; Tang, Patrick Y; Vines, Anissa I; Walker, Jennifer S; Fisher, Edwin B

Artículo [ PMID: 30293093 ] Idioma(s): Inglés

9.

Improving publication quality and the importance of Post Publication Peer Review: The illustrating example of X chromosome analysis and calculation of forensic parameters.

Ferragut, J F; Pinto, N; Amorim, A; Picornell, A

Artículo [ PMID: 30455113 ] Idioma(s): Inglés

10.

SETAC journals adopt double-blind peer review.

Menzie, Charles

Artículo [ PMID: 30589976 ] Idioma(s): Inglés

biblioteca virtual en salud

Comunicación Científica en Salud

Su selección ()

Email

Imprimir

Resultado en

Peer support interventions for breast cancer patients: a systematic review.

Laughter and the Chair: Social Pressures Influencing Scoring During Grant Peer Review Meetings.

Impact of Peer Review on Use of Hypofractionated Regimens for Early-Stage Breast Cancer for Patients at a Tertiary Care Academic Medical Center and Its Community-Based Affiliates.

Science peer review for the 21st century: Assessing scientific consensus for decision-making while managing conflict of interests, reviewer and process bias.

Toxicologic Pathology Forum*: Opinion on Considerations for the Use of Whole Slide Images in GLP Pathology Peer Review.

Fake Peer Review and Inappropriate Authorship Are Real Evils.

Predatory Journals Undermine Peer Review and Cheapen Scholarship.

Peer support opportunities across the cancer care continuum: a systematic scoping review of recent peer-reviewed literature.

Improving publication quality and the importance of Post Publication Peer Review: The illustrating example of X chromosome analysis and calculation of forensic parameters.

SETAC journals adopt double-blind peer review.

biblioteca virtual en salud

Comunicación Científica en Salud

Opciones

Email

Imprimir

Resultado en